Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.

Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shankun Zhao, Ran Kang, Tuo Deng, Lianmin Luo, Jiamin Wang, Ermao Li, Jintai Luo, Luhao Liu, ShawPong Wan, Zhigang Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5828359?pdf=render
id doaj-679ce12e70e641dda5cf753b4ab0c6a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-679ce12e70e641dda5cf753b4ab0c6a72020-11-25T02:47:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019354310.1371/journal.pone.0193543Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.Shankun ZhaoRan KangTuo DengLianmin LuoJiamin WangErmao LiJintai LuoLuhao LiuShawPong WanZhigang ZhaoIntracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5828359?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shankun Zhao
Ran Kang
Tuo Deng
Lianmin Luo
Jiamin Wang
Ermao Li
Jintai Luo
Luhao Liu
ShawPong Wan
Zhigang Zhao
spellingShingle Shankun Zhao
Ran Kang
Tuo Deng
Lianmin Luo
Jiamin Wang
Ermao Li
Jintai Luo
Luhao Liu
ShawPong Wan
Zhigang Zhao
Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shankun Zhao
Ran Kang
Tuo Deng
Lianmin Luo
Jiamin Wang
Ermao Li
Jintai Luo
Luhao Liu
ShawPong Wan
Zhigang Zhao
author_sort Shankun Zhao
title Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
title_short Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
title_full Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
title_fullStr Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
title_sort comparison of two cannulation methods for assessment of intracavernosal pressure in a rat model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement is a well-established technique for assessing the erectile function, which was performed by cannulating either crus or shaft of the penis. However, there are no studies concerning the experimental performance of the two cannulation sites yet. The aim of this study was to compare the measuring outcomes using two different cannulation sites. To validate the capacity of our study, both normal and the castration-induced erectile dysfunction rat models were conducted. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized equally into two groups: an intact group and a castration group. Five rats from each group firstly underwent different stimulation parameters to detect the optimal erectile responses. The residual rats in each group were further assigned into two subgroups (n = 10 per subgroup) according to two different cannulation sites (crus or shaft of the corpus cavernosum). The ICP values were compared between groups after different interventions. The optimal parameters for mean maximum ICP were recorded at 2.5V and a frequency of 15 Hz. The rats under the two different cannulation sites tended to show similar ICP values in both the intact and the castration groups. However, the success rate in monitoring ICP was significantly higher in the groups cannulating into the shaft of the penis compared to the crus (100% vs. 70%; P = 0.02). Our data suggested that the method of cannulation into the penile shaft could serve as a better alternative for the ICP measurement in rats.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5828359?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shankunzhao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT rankang comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT tuodeng comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT lianminluo comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT jiaminwang comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT ermaoli comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT jintailuo comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT luhaoliu comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT shawpongwan comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
AT zhigangzhao comparisonoftwocannulationmethodsforassessmentofintracavernosalpressureinaratmodel
_version_ 1724754401227177984