Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018

The present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dimitris Liakopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2019-11-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183
id doaj-67b1ce957af24bb4beae6d0bd3e3493b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67b1ce957af24bb4beae6d0bd3e3493b2021-10-02T04:11:53ZengDanubius UniversityActa Universitatis Danubius: Juridica1844-80622065-38912019-11-0115388110Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018Dimitris Liakopoulos0Fletcher School-Tufts UniversityThe present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The extraordinary pre-trial detention of the victims has breached their right to personal liberty and security (art. 5 of the Convention) and their right to freedom of expression (art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights). The orientation seems to be based essentially on the findings of the domestic Constitutional Court. This means that the Court of Strasbourg has not departed from its strict interpretation of the rule of previous exhaustion of domestic remedies but open for a more careful international control over emergency measures. The method of analysis is based in analysis of a case study which was analyzed and based on the international doctrine of ECtHR.http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dimitris Liakopoulos
spellingShingle Dimitris Liakopoulos
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception
author_facet Dimitris Liakopoulos
author_sort Dimitris Liakopoulos
title Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
title_short Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
title_full Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
title_fullStr Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
title_full_unstemmed Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
title_sort turkish emergency measures in the european court of human rights. cases: şahin alpay v. turkey and mehmet hasan altan v. turkey of 20 march 2018
publisher Danubius University
series Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
issn 1844-8062
2065-3891
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The extraordinary pre-trial detention of the victims has breached their right to personal liberty and security (art. 5 of the Convention) and their right to freedom of expression (art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights). The orientation seems to be based essentially on the findings of the domestic Constitutional Court. This means that the Court of Strasbourg has not departed from its strict interpretation of the rule of previous exhaustion of domestic remedies but open for a more careful international control over emergency measures. The method of analysis is based in analysis of a case study which was analyzed and based on the international doctrine of ECtHR.
topic emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception
url http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrisliakopoulos turkishemergencymeasuresintheeuropeancourtofhumanrightscasessahinalpayvturkeyandmehmethasanaltanvturkeyof20march2018
_version_ 1716859373868810240