Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018
The present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The ex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Danubius University
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183 |
id |
doaj-67b1ce957af24bb4beae6d0bd3e3493b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-67b1ce957af24bb4beae6d0bd3e3493b2021-10-02T04:11:53ZengDanubius UniversityActa Universitatis Danubius: Juridica1844-80622065-38912019-11-0115388110Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018Dimitris Liakopoulos0Fletcher School-Tufts UniversityThe present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The extraordinary pre-trial detention of the victims has breached their right to personal liberty and security (art. 5 of the Convention) and their right to freedom of expression (art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights). The orientation seems to be based essentially on the findings of the domestic Constitutional Court. This means that the Court of Strasbourg has not departed from its strict interpretation of the rule of previous exhaustion of domestic remedies but open for a more careful international control over emergency measures. The method of analysis is based in analysis of a case study which was analyzed and based on the international doctrine of ECtHR.http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dimitris Liakopoulos |
spellingShingle |
Dimitris Liakopoulos Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception |
author_facet |
Dimitris Liakopoulos |
author_sort |
Dimitris Liakopoulos |
title |
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 |
title_short |
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 |
title_full |
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 |
title_fullStr |
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Turkish Emergency Measures in the European Court of Human Rights. Cases: Şahin Alpay V. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan V. Turkey of 20 March 2018 |
title_sort |
turkish emergency measures in the european court of human rights. cases: şahin alpay v. turkey and mehmet hasan altan v. turkey of 20 march 2018 |
publisher |
Danubius University |
series |
Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica |
issn |
1844-8062 2065-3891 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
The present work is concentrated on the analysis of European Court of Human
Rights (ECtHR), issued on cases: Şahin Alpay v. Turkey and Mehmet Hasan Altan v.
Turkey of 20 March 2018. ECtHR has ascertained the violation of conventional rights by
Turkish emergency measures for the first time. The extraordinary pre-trial detention of the
victims has breached their right to personal liberty and security (art. 5 of the Convention)
and their right to freedom of expression (art. 10 of the European Convention on Human
Rights). The orientation seems to be based essentially on the findings of the domestic
Constitutional Court. This means that the Court of Strasbourg has not departed from its
strict interpretation of the rule of previous exhaustion of domestic remedies but open for a
more careful international control over emergency measures. The method of analysis is
based in analysis of a case study which was analyzed and based on the international
doctrine of ECtHR. |
topic |
emergency measures; echr; ecthr; state of exception |
url |
http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/6263/5183 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dimitrisliakopoulos turkishemergencymeasuresintheeuropeancourtofhumanrightscasessahinalpayvturkeyandmehmethasanaltanvturkeyof20march2018 |
_version_ |
1716859373868810240 |