Cultural-Historical Approach to Education

he article raises questions about the causes of those problems and difficulties that occur in modern Russian education, and ways to overcome them. The starting point for the authors' thoughts is the problem posed by L.S. Vygotsky of the correlation and interconnection of training and developmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kravtsov G.G., Kravtsova E.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2020-12-01
Series:Культурно-историческая психология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2020/n4/Kravtsov_Kravtsova.shtml
id doaj-67c1df155ad04a8fb64367967a8c9283
record_format Article
spelling doaj-67c1df155ad04a8fb64367967a8c92832020-12-10T08:38:26ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationКультурно-историческая психология1816-54352224-89352020-12-0116441310.17759/chp.2020160401Cultural-Historical Approach to EducationKravtsov G.G.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-3254Kravtsova E.E.1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-262XFederal Research and Clinical Center for Critical Care and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia Federal Research and Clinical Center for Critical Care and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russiahe article raises questions about the causes of those problems and difficulties that occur in modern Russian education, and ways to overcome them. The starting point for the authors' thoughts is the problem posed by L.S. Vygotsky of the correlation and interconnection of training and development. The assumption is made that a lot of troubles and difficulties in education are due to the lack of scientifically based didactics. The current theoretical ideas about what and how to teach children go back to the didactics of Y.A. Komensky, built on the basis of worldly experience and evidence of common sense that have nothing to do with scientific didactics. Studies of prominent Russian psychologists — P.Ya. Galperin and V.V. Davydov, as well as theories of training they created, according to the authors of this article, do not withstand criticism in the light of the requirements presented by scientific didactics. The main flaw is seen in the fact that these researchers were staunch supporters of the activity approach in psychology, which, in a sense, is an example of that traditional psychology that was rightly criticized by L. S. Vygotsky, since its method, historically established in natural science, does not even allow approach the study of such psychological realities that are behind the concepts of human freedom, his consciousness, personality, development, will and arbitrariness. The only constructive path in the psychology of education leading to the creation of scientifically based didactics is seen in an in-depth analysis and further development of ideas and principles put forward by L.S. Vygotsky, including, for example, the principle of historicism, the principle of integrity, the idea of a systemic and semantic structure consciousness, the paradoxical identity of communication and generalization. The gate leading to the correct understanding of the cultural-historical approach in psychology may be the position of D.B. Elkonin that the most important and fundamental for creating a theory of child development is the “individual-society” relationship, which in child psychology looks like a real relationship and communication of the child with his mother.https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2020/n4/Kravtsov_Kravtsova.shtmlnon-classical psychologynatural science methodlogic of internal self-justificationdevelopment as self-developmentfreedompersonalityconsciousnessleading activityformative approachtraining and developmenthistoricism principleintegrity principleexperimental genetic methodcausal dynamic analysisscientific didacticsactivity approachreflectiongeneralizationssystemic and semantic structure of consciousness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kravtsov G.G.
Kravtsova E.E.
spellingShingle Kravtsov G.G.
Kravtsova E.E.
Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
Культурно-историческая психология
non-classical psychology
natural science method
logic of internal self-justification
development as self-development
freedom
personality
consciousness
leading activity
formative approach
training and development
historicism principle
integrity principle
experimental genetic method
causal dynamic analysis
scientific didactics
activity approach
reflection
generalizations
systemic and semantic structure of consciousness
author_facet Kravtsov G.G.
Kravtsova E.E.
author_sort Kravtsov G.G.
title Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
title_short Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
title_full Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
title_fullStr Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
title_full_unstemmed Cultural-Historical Approach to Education
title_sort cultural-historical approach to education
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
series Культурно-историческая психология
issn 1816-5435
2224-8935
publishDate 2020-12-01
description he article raises questions about the causes of those problems and difficulties that occur in modern Russian education, and ways to overcome them. The starting point for the authors' thoughts is the problem posed by L.S. Vygotsky of the correlation and interconnection of training and development. The assumption is made that a lot of troubles and difficulties in education are due to the lack of scientifically based didactics. The current theoretical ideas about what and how to teach children go back to the didactics of Y.A. Komensky, built on the basis of worldly experience and evidence of common sense that have nothing to do with scientific didactics. Studies of prominent Russian psychologists — P.Ya. Galperin and V.V. Davydov, as well as theories of training they created, according to the authors of this article, do not withstand criticism in the light of the requirements presented by scientific didactics. The main flaw is seen in the fact that these researchers were staunch supporters of the activity approach in psychology, which, in a sense, is an example of that traditional psychology that was rightly criticized by L. S. Vygotsky, since its method, historically established in natural science, does not even allow approach the study of such psychological realities that are behind the concepts of human freedom, his consciousness, personality, development, will and arbitrariness. The only constructive path in the psychology of education leading to the creation of scientifically based didactics is seen in an in-depth analysis and further development of ideas and principles put forward by L.S. Vygotsky, including, for example, the principle of historicism, the principle of integrity, the idea of a systemic and semantic structure consciousness, the paradoxical identity of communication and generalization. The gate leading to the correct understanding of the cultural-historical approach in psychology may be the position of D.B. Elkonin that the most important and fundamental for creating a theory of child development is the “individual-society” relationship, which in child psychology looks like a real relationship and communication of the child with his mother.
topic non-classical psychology
natural science method
logic of internal self-justification
development as self-development
freedom
personality
consciousness
leading activity
formative approach
training and development
historicism principle
integrity principle
experimental genetic method
causal dynamic analysis
scientific didactics
activity approach
reflection
generalizations
systemic and semantic structure of consciousness
url https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2020/n4/Kravtsov_Kravtsova.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT kravtsovgg culturalhistoricalapproachtoeducation
AT kravtsovaee culturalhistoricalapproachtoeducation
_version_ 1724387498495311872