Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)

Abstract Background Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Belinda Lennox, Ksenija Yeeles, Peter B. Jones, Michael Zandi, Eileen Joyce, Ly-Mee Yu, Giuliano Tomei, Rebecca Pollard, Sally-Anne Vincent, Mio Shimazaki, Iona Cairns, Francis Dowling, Thomas Kabir, Thomas R. E. Barnes, Anne Lingford Hughes, Akram A. Hosseini, Timothy Harrower, Camilla Buckley, Alasdair Coles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1
id doaj-680f20e461b947d291e244f28a825ed9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Belinda Lennox
Ksenija Yeeles
Peter B. Jones
Michael Zandi
Eileen Joyce
Ly-Mee Yu
Giuliano Tomei
Rebecca Pollard
Sally-Anne Vincent
Mio Shimazaki
Iona Cairns
Francis Dowling
Thomas Kabir
Thomas R. E. Barnes
Anne Lingford Hughes
Akram A. Hosseini
Timothy Harrower
Camilla Buckley
Alasdair Coles
spellingShingle Belinda Lennox
Ksenija Yeeles
Peter B. Jones
Michael Zandi
Eileen Joyce
Ly-Mee Yu
Giuliano Tomei
Rebecca Pollard
Sally-Anne Vincent
Mio Shimazaki
Iona Cairns
Francis Dowling
Thomas Kabir
Thomas R. E. Barnes
Anne Lingford Hughes
Akram A. Hosseini
Timothy Harrower
Camilla Buckley
Alasdair Coles
Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
Trials
author_facet Belinda Lennox
Ksenija Yeeles
Peter B. Jones
Michael Zandi
Eileen Joyce
Ly-Mee Yu
Giuliano Tomei
Rebecca Pollard
Sally-Anne Vincent
Mio Shimazaki
Iona Cairns
Francis Dowling
Thomas Kabir
Thomas R. E. Barnes
Anne Lingford Hughes
Akram A. Hosseini
Timothy Harrower
Camilla Buckley
Alasdair Coles
author_sort Belinda Lennox
title Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
title_short Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
title_full Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
title_fullStr Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)
title_sort intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase iia double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (sinapps2)
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. Methods We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2–4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4–5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2–3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. Discussion The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. Trial registration ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1
work_keys_str_mv AT belindalennox intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT ksenijayeeles intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT peterbjones intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT michaelzandi intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT eileenjoyce intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT lymeeyu intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT giulianotomei intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT rebeccapollard intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT sallyannevincent intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT mioshimazaki intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT ionacairns intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT francisdowling intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT thomaskabir intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT thomasrebarnes intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT annelingfordhughes intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT akramahosseini intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT timothyharrower intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT camillabuckley intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
AT alasdaircoles intravenousimmunoglobulinandrituximabversusplacebotreatmentofantibodyassociatedpsychosisstudyprotocolofarandomisedphaseiiadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrialsinapps2
_version_ 1724620541449469952
spelling doaj-680f20e461b947d291e244f28a825ed92020-11-25T03:19:51ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-06-0120111210.1186/s13063-019-3336-1Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2)Belinda Lennox0Ksenija Yeeles1Peter B. Jones2Michael Zandi3Eileen Joyce4Ly-Mee Yu5Giuliano Tomei6Rebecca Pollard7Sally-Anne Vincent8Mio Shimazaki9Iona Cairns10Francis Dowling11Thomas Kabir12Thomas R. E. Barnes13Anne Lingford Hughes14Akram A. Hosseini15Timothy Harrower16Camilla Buckley17Alasdair Coles18Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalSchool of Clinical Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, and National Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryUniversity College London Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryPrimary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford HospitalResearch and Development, Devon Partnerships NHS Foundation TrustCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustThe McPin FoundationDepartment of Medicine, The Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College LondonCentre for Psychiatry, Imperial College LondonDepartment of Neurology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of CambridgeAbstract Background Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. Methods We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2–4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4–5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2–3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. Discussion The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. Trial registration ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1