A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia

Background: There is evidence that cognitive remediation (CR) is moderately effective in improving cognitive and functional difficulties in people with schizophrenia. However, there is still a limited understanding of what influence different treatment responses. Aim: To identify moderators influenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedetta Seccomandi, Dimosthenis Tsapekos, Katie Newbery, Til Wykes, Matteo Cella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300162
id doaj-6817d36cae67408185d81c9bd1a67be2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6817d36cae67408185d81c9bd1a67be22020-11-25T01:24:53ZengElsevierSchizophrenia Research: Cognition2215-00132020-03-0119A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophreniaBenedetta Seccomandi0Dimosthenis Tsapekos1Katie Newbery2Til Wykes3Matteo Cella4Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; Corresponding author at: Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UKDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ, UKDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ, UKDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ, UKBackground: There is evidence that cognitive remediation (CR) is moderately effective in improving cognitive and functional difficulties in people with schizophrenia. However, there is still a limited understanding of what influence different treatment responses. Aim: To identify moderators influencing CR response in people with schizophrenia. Methods: This systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted up to January 2019 on PubMed and PsychInfo to identify randomized controlled trials of CR reporting analyses of moderators of treatment response. All papers were assessed for methodological quality and information on sample size, intervention and control condition, moderators, outcomes, effect of moderator on outcomes and demographic characteristics from each study was extracted and critically summarised. Results: Thirty-six studies were included, considering 2737 participants. Study participants consisted on average of people in their late-thirties, mostly men, with over 10 years of illness. The review identified moderators that could be grouped into five categories: demographics, biological, cognitive and functional, psychological, and illness-related characteristics. The assessment of methodological quality showed that many studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusions: There was no high-quality replicated evidence which identifies reliable moderators of CR response. Many moderators were not replicated or presented in single, underpowered studies. Studies also investigated moderators independently despite their potential to overlap (e.g. age and education). Future research should concentrate on evaluating, with sound studies, the role moderators may play in affecting CR treatment response. This information can inform who will benefit most from the therapy and help to improve the benefits of CR. Keywords: Cognitive remediation, Cognition, Moderator, Schizophrenia, Psychosishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300162
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedetta Seccomandi
Dimosthenis Tsapekos
Katie Newbery
Til Wykes
Matteo Cella
spellingShingle Benedetta Seccomandi
Dimosthenis Tsapekos
Katie Newbery
Til Wykes
Matteo Cella
A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
author_facet Benedetta Seccomandi
Dimosthenis Tsapekos
Katie Newbery
Til Wykes
Matteo Cella
author_sort Benedetta Seccomandi
title A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
title_short A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
title_full A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
title_fullStr A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
title_sort systematic review of moderators of cognitive remediation response for people with schizophrenia
publisher Elsevier
series Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
issn 2215-0013
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Background: There is evidence that cognitive remediation (CR) is moderately effective in improving cognitive and functional difficulties in people with schizophrenia. However, there is still a limited understanding of what influence different treatment responses. Aim: To identify moderators influencing CR response in people with schizophrenia. Methods: This systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted up to January 2019 on PubMed and PsychInfo to identify randomized controlled trials of CR reporting analyses of moderators of treatment response. All papers were assessed for methodological quality and information on sample size, intervention and control condition, moderators, outcomes, effect of moderator on outcomes and demographic characteristics from each study was extracted and critically summarised. Results: Thirty-six studies were included, considering 2737 participants. Study participants consisted on average of people in their late-thirties, mostly men, with over 10 years of illness. The review identified moderators that could be grouped into five categories: demographics, biological, cognitive and functional, psychological, and illness-related characteristics. The assessment of methodological quality showed that many studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusions: There was no high-quality replicated evidence which identifies reliable moderators of CR response. Many moderators were not replicated or presented in single, underpowered studies. Studies also investigated moderators independently despite their potential to overlap (e.g. age and education). Future research should concentrate on evaluating, with sound studies, the role moderators may play in affecting CR treatment response. This information can inform who will benefit most from the therapy and help to improve the benefits of CR. Keywords: Cognitive remediation, Cognition, Moderator, Schizophrenia, Psychosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300162
work_keys_str_mv AT benedettaseccomandi asystematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT dimosthenistsapekos asystematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT katienewbery asystematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT tilwykes asystematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT matteocella asystematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT benedettaseccomandi systematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT dimosthenistsapekos systematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT katienewbery systematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT tilwykes systematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT matteocella systematicreviewofmoderatorsofcognitiveremediationresponseforpeoplewithschizophrenia
_version_ 1725116547086680064