Benefit‐Cost Analyses of Sentencing
The objective of the review was to identify and assess the quality of studies of the costs and benefits of different sentencing options. The review found only nine studies providing costs and benefits information. Due to the small number of studies uncovered by the review and, in some cases, poor me...
Main Authors: | C. McDougall, M. Cohen, R. Swaray, A. Perry |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.10 |
Similar Items
-
PROTOCOL: Cost‐benefit analysis and cost‐effectiveness of sentencing: A systematic review of the literature
by: Professor Cynthia McDougall, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01) -
Short-term costs of relocating a territory in a Caribbean damselfish, Stegastes diencaeus
by: McDougall, Peter T.
Published: (2003) -
Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople.
by: Eyal Aharoni, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Cost and benefit in language use: A case study of sentence particles in Japanese.
by: Tomoda, Shizuko.
Published: (1990) -
The use of equivalent annual cost for cost-benefit analyses in flood risk reduction strategies
by: Schoemaker M.A. (Maarten), et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)