Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas

Abstract Background Pulsatility is an important property of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and can be perceived by the fingers as a gradual decrease in strength downstream from the anastomosis along the main trunk of the fistula. The distance from the point at which the pulse becomes impe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matt Chiung-Yu Chen, Mei-Jui Weng, Misoso Yi-Wen Wu, Yi-Chun Liu, Wen-Che Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-09-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-019-1536-2
id doaj-682d580f72f54d70bdd169116208e53f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-682d580f72f54d70bdd169116208e53f2020-11-25T03:14:14ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692019-09-012011910.1186/s12882-019-1536-2Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulasMatt Chiung-Yu Chen0Mei-Jui Weng1Misoso Yi-Wen Wu2Yi-Chun Liu3Wen-Che Chi4Department of Interventional Radiology, Yuan’s General HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Nursing, Yuan’s General HospitalDepartment of Nephrology, Yuan’s General HospitalDepartment of Nephrology, Yuan’s General HospitalAbstract Background Pulsatility is an important property of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and can be perceived by the fingers as a gradual decrease in strength downstream from the anastomosis along the main trunk of the fistula. The distance from the point at which the pulse becomes imperceptible to the anastomosis is termed the palpable pulsatility length (PPL); we considered this length may play a role in assessing the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas. Methods This study was performed by retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. Physical examinations and fistula measurements were performed in a selected population of 76 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas during half a year. Fistula measurements included the PPL before and after treatment and the distance between the anastomosis and the arterial cannulation site (aPump length). The aPump index (API) was calculated by dividing the PPL by the aPump length. Angiograms were reviewed to determine the location and severity of stenosis. PPL and API were used to detect the critical inflow stenosis, which indicates severe inflow stenosis of an AVF. Results Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.895 for API and 0.878 for PPL. A cutoff value of API < 1.29 and PPL < 11.0 cm were selected to detect the critical inflow stenosis. The sensitivity was 96.0% versus 80.0% and specificity was 84.31% versus 84.31% for API and PPL, respectively. Conclusions PPL and API are useful tools in defining the severity of pure inflow stenosis for mature AVFs in the hands of trained examiners with high sensitivity and specificity.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-019-1536-2HemodialysisPhysical examinations and diagnosesArteriovenous shuntSurgicalBlood flow velocity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matt Chiung-Yu Chen
Mei-Jui Weng
Misoso Yi-Wen Wu
Yi-Chun Liu
Wen-Che Chi
spellingShingle Matt Chiung-Yu Chen
Mei-Jui Weng
Misoso Yi-Wen Wu
Yi-Chun Liu
Wen-Che Chi
Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
BMC Nephrology
Hemodialysis
Physical examinations and diagnoses
Arteriovenous shunt
Surgical
Blood flow velocity
author_facet Matt Chiung-Yu Chen
Mei-Jui Weng
Misoso Yi-Wen Wu
Yi-Chun Liu
Wen-Che Chi
author_sort Matt Chiung-Yu Chen
title Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
title_short Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
title_full Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
title_fullStr Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
title_sort measuring the palpable pulsatility length as a physical examination test in defining the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Background Pulsatility is an important property of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and can be perceived by the fingers as a gradual decrease in strength downstream from the anastomosis along the main trunk of the fistula. The distance from the point at which the pulse becomes imperceptible to the anastomosis is termed the palpable pulsatility length (PPL); we considered this length may play a role in assessing the severity of inflow stenosis for hemodialysis fistulas. Methods This study was performed by retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. Physical examinations and fistula measurements were performed in a selected population of 76 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas during half a year. Fistula measurements included the PPL before and after treatment and the distance between the anastomosis and the arterial cannulation site (aPump length). The aPump index (API) was calculated by dividing the PPL by the aPump length. Angiograms were reviewed to determine the location and severity of stenosis. PPL and API were used to detect the critical inflow stenosis, which indicates severe inflow stenosis of an AVF. Results Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.895 for API and 0.878 for PPL. A cutoff value of API < 1.29 and PPL < 11.0 cm were selected to detect the critical inflow stenosis. The sensitivity was 96.0% versus 80.0% and specificity was 84.31% versus 84.31% for API and PPL, respectively. Conclusions PPL and API are useful tools in defining the severity of pure inflow stenosis for mature AVFs in the hands of trained examiners with high sensitivity and specificity.
topic Hemodialysis
Physical examinations and diagnoses
Arteriovenous shunt
Surgical
Blood flow velocity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-019-1536-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mattchiungyuchen measuringthepalpablepulsatilitylengthasaphysicalexaminationtestindefiningtheseverityofinflowstenosisforhemodialysisfistulas
AT meijuiweng measuringthepalpablepulsatilitylengthasaphysicalexaminationtestindefiningtheseverityofinflowstenosisforhemodialysisfistulas
AT misosoyiwenwu measuringthepalpablepulsatilitylengthasaphysicalexaminationtestindefiningtheseverityofinflowstenosisforhemodialysisfistulas
AT yichunliu measuringthepalpablepulsatilitylengthasaphysicalexaminationtestindefiningtheseverityofinflowstenosisforhemodialysisfistulas
AT wenchechi measuringthepalpablepulsatilitylengthasaphysicalexaminationtestindefiningtheseverityofinflowstenosisforhemodialysisfistulas
_version_ 1724643745563934720