Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days

Statement of Problem: Patients’ demand for tooth-colored restoratives in the posterior region is increasing. Clinicians use universal nanohybrid resin composites for both anterior and posterior regions. There are few published reports comparing fracture toughness of nonohybrids and that of hy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sookhakiyan M, Tavana S, Azarnia Y, Bagheri R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2017-03-01
Series:Journal of Dental Biomaterial
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/view/192
id doaj-68334c231b854491bfd6c3c820c64c12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68334c231b854491bfd6c3c820c64c122020-11-24T21:16:03ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Biomaterial2383-39712383-398X2017-03-0141341346Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 DaysSookhakiyan M0Tavana S1Azarnia Y2Bagheri R3Shiraz Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranShiraz Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranShiraz Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranDental Materials Department and Biomaterials Research Centre, Shiraz Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IranStatement of Problem: Patients’ demand for tooth-colored restoratives in the posterior region is increasing. Clinicians use universal nanohybrid resin composites for both anterior and posterior regions. There are few published reports comparing fracture toughness of nonohybrids and that of hybrid composite stored wet and dry. Objectives: To investigate the fracture toughness of three nanohybrids compared to that of a hybrid resin composite stored dry or wet up to 60 days, using four- point bending test. Materials and Methods: Four resin composites were used: three nanohybrids; Filtek Supreme (3M), Ice (SDI), TPH3 (Dentsply) and one hybrid Filtek P60 (3M). For each material, 40 rectangular notched beam specimens were prepared with dimensions of 30 mm × 5mm × 2mm. The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10) and stored at 37ºC either in distilled water or dry for 1 and 60 days. The specimens were placed on the four-point test jig and subjected to force (N) using universal testing machine loaded at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min and maximum load at specimen failure was recorded and KIc was calculated. Results: Three-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction between all the factors (all p < .0001). Except for TPH3, all tested materials showed significantly higher KIc when stored dry than stored wet (p < 0.05). After 1 day of dry storage, Ice showed the highest KIc (2.04 ± 0.32) followed by Filtek P60 and the lowest was for Filtek Supreme (1.39 ± 0.13). The effect of time on fracture toughness was material dependent. Conclusions: Wet storage adversely affected the fracture toughness of almost all materials. Keeping the restoration dry in the mouth may increase their fracture toughness. Therefore, using a coating agent on the surface of restoration may protect them from early water uptake and increase their strength during a time period.http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/view/192NanohybridHybrid CompositeFracture ToughnessWet/Dry Storage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sookhakiyan M
Tavana S
Azarnia Y
Bagheri R
spellingShingle Sookhakiyan M
Tavana S
Azarnia Y
Bagheri R
Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
Journal of Dental Biomaterial
Nanohybrid
Hybrid Composite
Fracture Toughness
Wet/Dry Storage
author_facet Sookhakiyan M
Tavana S
Azarnia Y
Bagheri R
author_sort Sookhakiyan M
title Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
title_short Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
title_full Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
title_fullStr Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days
title_sort fracture toughness of nanohybrid and hybrid composites stored wet and dry up to 60 days
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Biomaterial
issn 2383-3971
2383-398X
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Statement of Problem: Patients’ demand for tooth-colored restoratives in the posterior region is increasing. Clinicians use universal nanohybrid resin composites for both anterior and posterior regions. There are few published reports comparing fracture toughness of nonohybrids and that of hybrid composite stored wet and dry. Objectives: To investigate the fracture toughness of three nanohybrids compared to that of a hybrid resin composite stored dry or wet up to 60 days, using four- point bending test. Materials and Methods: Four resin composites were used: three nanohybrids; Filtek Supreme (3M), Ice (SDI), TPH3 (Dentsply) and one hybrid Filtek P60 (3M). For each material, 40 rectangular notched beam specimens were prepared with dimensions of 30 mm × 5mm × 2mm. The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10) and stored at 37ºC either in distilled water or dry for 1 and 60 days. The specimens were placed on the four-point test jig and subjected to force (N) using universal testing machine loaded at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min and maximum load at specimen failure was recorded and KIc was calculated. Results: Three-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction between all the factors (all p < .0001). Except for TPH3, all tested materials showed significantly higher KIc when stored dry than stored wet (p < 0.05). After 1 day of dry storage, Ice showed the highest KIc (2.04 ± 0.32) followed by Filtek P60 and the lowest was for Filtek Supreme (1.39 ± 0.13). The effect of time on fracture toughness was material dependent. Conclusions: Wet storage adversely affected the fracture toughness of almost all materials. Keeping the restoration dry in the mouth may increase their fracture toughness. Therefore, using a coating agent on the surface of restoration may protect them from early water uptake and increase their strength during a time period.
topic Nanohybrid
Hybrid Composite
Fracture Toughness
Wet/Dry Storage
url http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/view/192
work_keys_str_mv AT sookhakiyanm fracturetoughnessofnanohybridandhybridcompositesstoredwetanddryupto60days
AT tavanas fracturetoughnessofnanohybridandhybridcompositesstoredwetanddryupto60days
AT azarniay fracturetoughnessofnanohybridandhybridcompositesstoredwetanddryupto60days
AT bagherir fracturetoughnessofnanohybridandhybridcompositesstoredwetanddryupto60days
_version_ 1726017418258546688