Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries

<p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Côte, F. Wartmann, R. Purves
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-10-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf
id doaj-683802f8c8714305ae17d5fb87a5af03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-683802f8c8714305ae17d5fb87a5af032020-11-24T21:07:58ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982018-10-017325326010.5194/gh-73-253-2018Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundariesM. Côte0F. Wartmann1R. Purves2R. Purves3Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandEidgenössiche Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft (WSL), Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandURPP Language and Space, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland<p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation require reliable assessments, yet current definitions for what a forest exactly is differ significantly across countries, institutions and epistemic communities. Those differences have implications for forest management efforts: they entail different understandings about where exactly a forest starts and ends, and therefore also engender misunderstandings about where a forest <i>should</i> start and end, and about how forests should be managed. This special issue brings together different perspectives from practitioners and academic disciplines – including linguistics, geographic information science and human geography – around the problem of understanding and characterizing forest. By bringing together different disciplinary viewpoints, we hope to contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary efforts to analyse forest change. In this introduction, we propose that interrogating the relationship between forest definitions, boundaries and ways of valuing forests constitutes a productive way to critically conceptualize the trouble that forest is in.</p>https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Côte
F. Wartmann
R. Purves
R. Purves
spellingShingle M. Côte
F. Wartmann
R. Purves
R. Purves
Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet M. Côte
F. Wartmann
R. Purves
R. Purves
author_sort M. Côte
title Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
title_short Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
title_full Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
title_fullStr Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Introduction: The trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
title_sort introduction: the trouble with forest: definitions, values and boundaries
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2018-10-01
description <p>Forest is in trouble. The most recent (2015) FAO Forest Resources Assessment shows an encouraging trend towards a decrease in deforestation rates, but it also points out that since 1990 total forest loss corresponds to an area the size of South Africa. Efforts to curtail deforestation require reliable assessments, yet current definitions for what a forest exactly is differ significantly across countries, institutions and epistemic communities. Those differences have implications for forest management efforts: they entail different understandings about where exactly a forest starts and ends, and therefore also engender misunderstandings about where a forest <i>should</i> start and end, and about how forests should be managed. This special issue brings together different perspectives from practitioners and academic disciplines – including linguistics, geographic information science and human geography – around the problem of understanding and characterizing forest. By bringing together different disciplinary viewpoints, we hope to contribute to ongoing interdisciplinary efforts to analyse forest change. In this introduction, we propose that interrogating the relationship between forest definitions, boundaries and ways of valuing forests constitutes a productive way to critically conceptualize the trouble that forest is in.</p>
url https://www.geogr-helv.net/73/253/2018/gh-73-253-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mcote introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries
AT fwartmann introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries
AT rpurves introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries
AT rpurves introductionthetroublewithforestdefinitionsvaluesandboundaries
_version_ 1716761288258879488