Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap

While life in general can be explained by the mechanisms of physics, chemistry, and biology, to many scientists and philosophers, it appears that when it comes to explaining consciousness, there is what the philosopher Joseph Levine called an “explanatory gap” between the physical brain and subjecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd E. Feinberg, Jon Mallatt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686/full
id doaj-68a150205aca4c1ab3fbcf0e0d1cc150
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68a150205aca4c1ab3fbcf0e0d1cc1502020-11-25T00:54:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-07-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686459671Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory GapTodd E. Feinberg0Jon Mallatt1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Psychiatry and Neurology, New York, NY, United StatesThe University of Washington WWAMI Medical Education Program at The University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United StatesWhile life in general can be explained by the mechanisms of physics, chemistry, and biology, to many scientists and philosophers, it appears that when it comes to explaining consciousness, there is what the philosopher Joseph Levine called an “explanatory gap” between the physical brain and subjective experiences. Here, we deduce the living and neural features behind primary consciousness within a naturalistic biological framework, identify which animal taxa have these features (the vertebrates, arthropods, and cephalopod molluscs), then reconstruct when consciousness first evolved and consider its adaptive value. We theorize that consciousness is based on all the complex system features of life, plus even more complex features of elaborate brains. We argue that the main reason why the explanatory gap between the brain and experience has been so refractory to scientific explanation is that it arises from both life and from varied and diverse brains and brain regions, so bridging the gap requires a complex, multifactorial account that includes the great diversity of consciousness, its personal nature that stems from embodied life, and the special neural features that make consciousness unique in nature.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686/fullprimary consciousnessphenomenal consciousnessexplanatory gapneurobiologysubjectivityevolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Todd E. Feinberg
Jon Mallatt
spellingShingle Todd E. Feinberg
Jon Mallatt
Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
Frontiers in Psychology
primary consciousness
phenomenal consciousness
explanatory gap
neurobiology
subjectivity
evolution
author_facet Todd E. Feinberg
Jon Mallatt
author_sort Todd E. Feinberg
title Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
title_short Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
title_full Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
title_fullStr Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
title_full_unstemmed Subjectivity “Demystified”: Neurobiology, Evolution, and the Explanatory Gap
title_sort subjectivity “demystified”: neurobiology, evolution, and the explanatory gap
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-07-01
description While life in general can be explained by the mechanisms of physics, chemistry, and biology, to many scientists and philosophers, it appears that when it comes to explaining consciousness, there is what the philosopher Joseph Levine called an “explanatory gap” between the physical brain and subjective experiences. Here, we deduce the living and neural features behind primary consciousness within a naturalistic biological framework, identify which animal taxa have these features (the vertebrates, arthropods, and cephalopod molluscs), then reconstruct when consciousness first evolved and consider its adaptive value. We theorize that consciousness is based on all the complex system features of life, plus even more complex features of elaborate brains. We argue that the main reason why the explanatory gap between the brain and experience has been so refractory to scientific explanation is that it arises from both life and from varied and diverse brains and brain regions, so bridging the gap requires a complex, multifactorial account that includes the great diversity of consciousness, its personal nature that stems from embodied life, and the special neural features that make consciousness unique in nature.
topic primary consciousness
phenomenal consciousness
explanatory gap
neurobiology
subjectivity
evolution
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686/full
work_keys_str_mv AT toddefeinberg subjectivitydemystifiedneurobiologyevolutionandtheexplanatorygap
AT jonmallatt subjectivitydemystifiedneurobiologyevolutionandtheexplanatorygap
_version_ 1725234784461914112