Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone

This work aims to study and compare different range finders applied to altitude sensing on a rotating wings UAV. The specific application is the altitude maintenance for the fluid deployment valve aperture control in an unmanned pulverization aircraft used in precision agriculture. The influence of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matheus Hentschke, Edison Pignaton de Freitas, Carlos Henrique Hennig, Igor Caike Girardi da Veiga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Drones
Subjects:
UAV
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/2/3/25
id doaj-68a48e6681c3476e8887b13f1b707640
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68a48e6681c3476e8887b13f1b7076402020-11-25T00:13:46ZengMDPI AGDrones2504-446X2018-08-01232510.3390/drones2030025drones2030025Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying DroneMatheus Hentschke0Edison Pignaton de Freitas1Carlos Henrique Hennig2Igor Caike Girardi da Veiga3Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS 90035-190, BrazilFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS 90035-190, BrazilSkydrones Avionics Technology, Porto Alegre, RS 91020-030, BrazilFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS 90035-190, BrazilThis work aims to study and compare different range finders applied to altitude sensing on a rotating wings UAV. The specific application is the altitude maintenance for the fluid deployment valve aperture control in an unmanned pulverization aircraft used in precision agriculture. The influence of a variety of parameters are analyzed, including the tolerance for crop inconsistencies, density variations and intrinsic factors to the process, such as the pulverization fluid interference in the sensor’s readings, as well as their vulnerability to harsh conditions of the operation environment. Filtering and data extraction techniques were applied and analyzed in order to enhance the measurement reliability. As a result, a wide study was performed, enabling better decision making about choosing the most appropriate sensor for each situation under analysis. The performed data analysis was able to provide a reliable baseline to compare the sensors. With a baseline set, it was possible to counterweight the sensors errors and other factors such as the MSE for each environment to provide a summarized score of the sensors. The sensors which provided the best performance in the used metrics and tested environment were Lightware SF11-C and LeddarTech M16.http://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/2/3/25crop sprayingpulverizationUAVTOF sensorsaltitude
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matheus Hentschke
Edison Pignaton de Freitas
Carlos Henrique Hennig
Igor Caike Girardi da Veiga
spellingShingle Matheus Hentschke
Edison Pignaton de Freitas
Carlos Henrique Hennig
Igor Caike Girardi da Veiga
Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
Drones
crop spraying
pulverization
UAV
TOF sensors
altitude
author_facet Matheus Hentschke
Edison Pignaton de Freitas
Carlos Henrique Hennig
Igor Caike Girardi da Veiga
author_sort Matheus Hentschke
title Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
title_short Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
title_full Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
title_fullStr Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Altitude Sensors for a Crop Spraying Drone
title_sort evaluation of altitude sensors for a crop spraying drone
publisher MDPI AG
series Drones
issn 2504-446X
publishDate 2018-08-01
description This work aims to study and compare different range finders applied to altitude sensing on a rotating wings UAV. The specific application is the altitude maintenance for the fluid deployment valve aperture control in an unmanned pulverization aircraft used in precision agriculture. The influence of a variety of parameters are analyzed, including the tolerance for crop inconsistencies, density variations and intrinsic factors to the process, such as the pulverization fluid interference in the sensor’s readings, as well as their vulnerability to harsh conditions of the operation environment. Filtering and data extraction techniques were applied and analyzed in order to enhance the measurement reliability. As a result, a wide study was performed, enabling better decision making about choosing the most appropriate sensor for each situation under analysis. The performed data analysis was able to provide a reliable baseline to compare the sensors. With a baseline set, it was possible to counterweight the sensors errors and other factors such as the MSE for each environment to provide a summarized score of the sensors. The sensors which provided the best performance in the used metrics and tested environment were Lightware SF11-C and LeddarTech M16.
topic crop spraying
pulverization
UAV
TOF sensors
altitude
url http://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/2/3/25
work_keys_str_mv AT matheushentschke evaluationofaltitudesensorsforacropsprayingdrone
AT edisonpignatondefreitas evaluationofaltitudesensorsforacropsprayingdrone
AT carloshenriquehennig evaluationofaltitudesensorsforacropsprayingdrone
AT igorcaikegirardidaveiga evaluationofaltitudesensorsforacropsprayingdrone
_version_ 1725393093244485632