Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Background When managing patients with cancer, lymphedema of the lower limbs (LLL) is commonly reported as secondary to the surgical excision and/or irradiation of lymph nodes (LNs). In the framework of lymphoscintigraphic imaging performed to evaluate secondary LLL, some lympho-nodal prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirela Mariana Roman, Romain Barbieux, Jean-Marie Nogaret, Pierre Bourgeois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1379-5
id doaj-68d29d9268b74070a9dd334a58a1d5fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68d29d9268b74070a9dd334a58a1d5fc2020-11-24T21:59:13ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192018-04-011611610.1186/s12957-018-1379-5Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysisMirela Mariana Roman0Romain Barbieux1Jean-Marie Nogaret2Pierre Bourgeois3Department of Mammo-Pelvic Surgery, Jules Bordet InstituteService of Kinesitherapy, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de BruxellesDepartment of Mammo-Pelvic Surgery, Jules Bordet InstituteService of Nuclear Medicine, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de BruxellesAbstract Background When managing patients with cancer, lymphedema of the lower limbs (LLL) is commonly reported as secondary to the surgical excision and/or irradiation of lymph nodes (LNs). In the framework of lymphoscintigraphic imaging performed to evaluate secondary LLL, some lympho-nodal presentations have been observed that could not be explained by the applied treatments, suggesting that these LLL might be primary. Therefore, all our lymphoscintigraphic examinations that were performed in patients for LLL after surgery for gynecological or urological cancer were retrospectively analyzed in order to evaluate the frequency in which these LLL might not be secondary (either completely or partially) but primary in origin. Methods Lymphoscintigraphies performed in 33 patients who underwent LN dissection (limited to the intra-abdominal LN) with or without radiotherapy for histologically confirmed ovarian cancer (n = 6), uterine cancer (n = 14 with cervical cancer and n = 7 with endometrial cancer), or prostate cancer (n = 6) were compared to lymphoscintigraphies obtained in primary LLL. Results In 12 (33% of the) patients (3 men plus 9 women, 4 with cervical cancer and 5 with endometrial cancer), scintigraphy of the lower limbs revealed lympho-nodal presentation that did not match with the expected consequences of the surgical and/or radiological treatments and were either suggestive or typical of primary lymphedema. Conclusions This retrospective analysis of a limited but well-defined series of patients suggests that the appearance of LLL might not be related to cancer treatment(s) but that these LLL may represent the development of a primary lymphatic disease latent prior to the therapeutic interventions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1379-5Cancer-related lymphedemaLower limbLymphoscintigraphyPrimary lymphedemaSecondary lymphedema
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mirela Mariana Roman
Romain Barbieux
Jean-Marie Nogaret
Pierre Bourgeois
spellingShingle Mirela Mariana Roman
Romain Barbieux
Jean-Marie Nogaret
Pierre Bourgeois
Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Cancer-related lymphedema
Lower limb
Lymphoscintigraphy
Primary lymphedema
Secondary lymphedema
author_facet Mirela Mariana Roman
Romain Barbieux
Jean-Marie Nogaret
Pierre Bourgeois
author_sort Mirela Mariana Roman
title Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
title_short Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
title_full Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
title_sort use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background When managing patients with cancer, lymphedema of the lower limbs (LLL) is commonly reported as secondary to the surgical excision and/or irradiation of lymph nodes (LNs). In the framework of lymphoscintigraphic imaging performed to evaluate secondary LLL, some lympho-nodal presentations have been observed that could not be explained by the applied treatments, suggesting that these LLL might be primary. Therefore, all our lymphoscintigraphic examinations that were performed in patients for LLL after surgery for gynecological or urological cancer were retrospectively analyzed in order to evaluate the frequency in which these LLL might not be secondary (either completely or partially) but primary in origin. Methods Lymphoscintigraphies performed in 33 patients who underwent LN dissection (limited to the intra-abdominal LN) with or without radiotherapy for histologically confirmed ovarian cancer (n = 6), uterine cancer (n = 14 with cervical cancer and n = 7 with endometrial cancer), or prostate cancer (n = 6) were compared to lymphoscintigraphies obtained in primary LLL. Results In 12 (33% of the) patients (3 men plus 9 women, 4 with cervical cancer and 5 with endometrial cancer), scintigraphy of the lower limbs revealed lympho-nodal presentation that did not match with the expected consequences of the surgical and/or radiological treatments and were either suggestive or typical of primary lymphedema. Conclusions This retrospective analysis of a limited but well-defined series of patients suggests that the appearance of LLL might not be related to cancer treatment(s) but that these LLL may represent the development of a primary lymphatic disease latent prior to the therapeutic interventions.
topic Cancer-related lymphedema
Lower limb
Lymphoscintigraphy
Primary lymphedema
Secondary lymphedema
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1379-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mirelamarianaroman useoflymphoscintigraphytodifferentiateprimaryversussecondarylowerextremitylymphedemaaftersurgicallymphadenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT romainbarbieux useoflymphoscintigraphytodifferentiateprimaryversussecondarylowerextremitylymphedemaaftersurgicallymphadenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT jeanmarienogaret useoflymphoscintigraphytodifferentiateprimaryversussecondarylowerextremitylymphedemaaftersurgicallymphadenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pierrebourgeois useoflymphoscintigraphytodifferentiateprimaryversussecondarylowerextremitylymphedemaaftersurgicallymphadenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
_version_ 1725848189258432512