Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles

Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroshi Hasegawa, Tetsuharu Kaneko, Manabu Endo, Chihiro Kanno, Morio Yamazaki, Sadanoshin Yaginuma, Hiroki Igarashi, Hideaki Honma, Seiichiro Masui, Mizuki Suto, Yukihiko Sakisaka, Hiroshi Ishihata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3358
id doaj-68edfb04389c41bfbaad78133a4308c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-68edfb04389c41bfbaad78133a4308c52021-07-01T00:25:56ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-06-01143358335810.3390/ma14123358Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog MandiblesHiroshi Hasegawa0Tetsuharu Kaneko1Manabu Endo2Chihiro Kanno3Morio Yamazaki4Sadanoshin Yaginuma5Hiroki Igarashi6Hideaki Honma7Seiichiro Masui8Mizuki Suto9Yukihiko Sakisaka10Hiroshi Ishihata11Department of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dentistry, Fukushima Medical University, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Koseikai Hospital, 16-2, Nariide, Kitasawamata, Fukushima 960-8251, JapanDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Omachi Hospital, 3-97, Omachi, Haranomachi-ku, Minami-Soma, Fukushima 975-0001, JapanClinical Research Center, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, 1, Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-1295, JapanDivision of Periodontology and Endodontology, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, JapanDivision of Periodontology and Endodontology, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, JapanDivision of Periodontology and Endodontology, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, JapanAcute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.05; <i>p</i> = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3358guided bone regenerationtitanium membranebarrier membranemicroporous titanium
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hiroshi Hasegawa
Tetsuharu Kaneko
Manabu Endo
Chihiro Kanno
Morio Yamazaki
Sadanoshin Yaginuma
Hiroki Igarashi
Hideaki Honma
Seiichiro Masui
Mizuki Suto
Yukihiko Sakisaka
Hiroshi Ishihata
spellingShingle Hiroshi Hasegawa
Tetsuharu Kaneko
Manabu Endo
Chihiro Kanno
Morio Yamazaki
Sadanoshin Yaginuma
Hiroki Igarashi
Hideaki Honma
Seiichiro Masui
Mizuki Suto
Yukihiko Sakisaka
Hiroshi Ishihata
Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
Materials
guided bone regeneration
titanium membrane
barrier membrane
microporous titanium
author_facet Hiroshi Hasegawa
Tetsuharu Kaneko
Manabu Endo
Chihiro Kanno
Morio Yamazaki
Sadanoshin Yaginuma
Hiroki Igarashi
Hideaki Honma
Seiichiro Masui
Mizuki Suto
Yukihiko Sakisaka
Hiroshi Ishihata
author_sort Hiroshi Hasegawa
title Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_short Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_full Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_fullStr Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Efficacy of a Microperforated Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Existing Mesh Retainer in Dog Mandibles
title_sort comparing the efficacy of a microperforated titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration with an existing mesh retainer in dog mandibles
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Acute-type lateral ridge defects (25 mm × 6 mm × 5 mm) were bilaterally created in the mandibles of four dogs (two defects per animal). The defects were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone and covered with a microperforated titanium membrane (Ti-honeycomb membrane, TiHM) or an existing conventional titanium mesh as control. The samples were dissected after 16 weeks postoperatively and processed for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses. Regenerated tissue and bone volume were significantly larger in the TiHM group than in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.05; <i>p</i> = 0.049). In contrast, bone mineral density was similar between the two groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the regenerated bone area and calcific osseous area were larger in the TiHM group than in the control group; however, the differences were not significant. The efficacy of TiHM was generally satisfactory with the potential to become a standard tool for the GBR procedure; however, early membrane exposure will be a major problem to overcome.
topic guided bone regeneration
titanium membrane
barrier membrane
microporous titanium
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3358
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroshihasegawa comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT tetsuharukaneko comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT manabuendo comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT chihirokanno comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT morioyamazaki comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT sadanoshinyaginuma comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT hirokiigarashi comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT hideakihonma comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT seiichiromasui comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT mizukisuto comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT yukihikosakisaka comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
AT hiroshiishihata comparingtheefficacyofamicroperforatedtitaniummembraneforguidedboneregenerationwithanexistingmeshretainerindogmandibles
_version_ 1721348622107279360