What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: “Open peer review” (OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations. The literature reflects this, with a myriad of overlapping and often contradictory definitions. While the term is used b...
Main Author: | Tony Ross-Hellauer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2017-04-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/6-588/v1 |
Similar Items
-
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Bastian Greshake
Published: (2017-04-01) -
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Aiming for long-term, objective-driven science communication in the UK [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Andreas Prokop, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Evaluation of unique identifiers used for citation linking [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Heidi Holst Madsen, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)