Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.

The present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both young...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denton J DeLoss, George J Andersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773
id doaj-6940537c301f4346a1caa8a2af8db76c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6940537c301f4346a1caa8a2af8db76c2021-03-03T19:57:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014377310.1371/journal.pone.0143773Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.Denton J DeLossGeorge J AndersenThe present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both younger and older participants demonstrated their ability to detect 1-2 visual flashes and 1-2 auditory beep presented unimodally. After passing the pre-test, participants were then presented 1-2 flashes paired with 0-2 beeps that originated from one of five speakers positioned equidistantly 100 cm from the participant. One speaker was positioned directly below the screen, two speakers were positioned 50 cm to the left and right from the center of the screen, and two more speakers positioned to the left and right 100 cm from the center of the screen. Participants were told to report the number of flashes presented and to ignore the beeps. Both age groups showed a significant effect of the beeps on the perceived number of flashes. However, neither younger nor older individuals showed any significant effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion. The presence of a congruent number of beeps increased accuracy for both older and younger individuals. Reaction time data was also analyzed. As expected, older individuals showed significantly longer reaction times when compared to younger individuals. In addition, both older and younger individuals showed a significant increase in reaction time for fusion trials, where two flashes and one beep are perceived as a single flash, as compared to congruent single flash trials. This increase in reaction time was not found for fission trials, where one flash and two beeps were perceived as two flashes. This suggests that processing may differ for the two forms for fission as compared to fusion illusions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denton J DeLoss
George J Andersen
spellingShingle Denton J DeLoss
George J Andersen
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Denton J DeLoss
George J Andersen
author_sort Denton J DeLoss
title Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
title_short Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
title_full Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
title_fullStr Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
title_full_unstemmed Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
title_sort aging, spatial disparity, and the sound-induced flash illusion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both younger and older participants demonstrated their ability to detect 1-2 visual flashes and 1-2 auditory beep presented unimodally. After passing the pre-test, participants were then presented 1-2 flashes paired with 0-2 beeps that originated from one of five speakers positioned equidistantly 100 cm from the participant. One speaker was positioned directly below the screen, two speakers were positioned 50 cm to the left and right from the center of the screen, and two more speakers positioned to the left and right 100 cm from the center of the screen. Participants were told to report the number of flashes presented and to ignore the beeps. Both age groups showed a significant effect of the beeps on the perceived number of flashes. However, neither younger nor older individuals showed any significant effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion. The presence of a congruent number of beeps increased accuracy for both older and younger individuals. Reaction time data was also analyzed. As expected, older individuals showed significantly longer reaction times when compared to younger individuals. In addition, both older and younger individuals showed a significant increase in reaction time for fusion trials, where two flashes and one beep are perceived as a single flash, as compared to congruent single flash trials. This increase in reaction time was not found for fission trials, where one flash and two beeps were perceived as two flashes. This suggests that processing may differ for the two forms for fission as compared to fusion illusions.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773
work_keys_str_mv AT dentonjdeloss agingspatialdisparityandthesoundinducedflashillusion
AT georgejandersen agingspatialdisparityandthesoundinducedflashillusion
_version_ 1714824817989910528