Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.
The present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both young...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773 |
id |
doaj-6940537c301f4346a1caa8a2af8db76c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6940537c301f4346a1caa8a2af8db76c2021-03-03T19:57:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014377310.1371/journal.pone.0143773Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion.Denton J DeLossGeorge J AndersenThe present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both younger and older participants demonstrated their ability to detect 1-2 visual flashes and 1-2 auditory beep presented unimodally. After passing the pre-test, participants were then presented 1-2 flashes paired with 0-2 beeps that originated from one of five speakers positioned equidistantly 100 cm from the participant. One speaker was positioned directly below the screen, two speakers were positioned 50 cm to the left and right from the center of the screen, and two more speakers positioned to the left and right 100 cm from the center of the screen. Participants were told to report the number of flashes presented and to ignore the beeps. Both age groups showed a significant effect of the beeps on the perceived number of flashes. However, neither younger nor older individuals showed any significant effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion. The presence of a congruent number of beeps increased accuracy for both older and younger individuals. Reaction time data was also analyzed. As expected, older individuals showed significantly longer reaction times when compared to younger individuals. In addition, both older and younger individuals showed a significant increase in reaction time for fusion trials, where two flashes and one beep are perceived as a single flash, as compared to congruent single flash trials. This increase in reaction time was not found for fission trials, where one flash and two beeps were perceived as two flashes. This suggests that processing may differ for the two forms for fission as compared to fusion illusions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denton J DeLoss George J Andersen |
spellingShingle |
Denton J DeLoss George J Andersen Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Denton J DeLoss George J Andersen |
author_sort |
Denton J DeLoss |
title |
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. |
title_short |
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. |
title_full |
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. |
title_fullStr |
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aging, Spatial Disparity, and the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. |
title_sort |
aging, spatial disparity, and the sound-induced flash illusion. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The present study examined age-related differences in multisensory integration and the effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion--an illusion used in previous research to assess age-related differences in multisensory integration. Prior to participation in the study, both younger and older participants demonstrated their ability to detect 1-2 visual flashes and 1-2 auditory beep presented unimodally. After passing the pre-test, participants were then presented 1-2 flashes paired with 0-2 beeps that originated from one of five speakers positioned equidistantly 100 cm from the participant. One speaker was positioned directly below the screen, two speakers were positioned 50 cm to the left and right from the center of the screen, and two more speakers positioned to the left and right 100 cm from the center of the screen. Participants were told to report the number of flashes presented and to ignore the beeps. Both age groups showed a significant effect of the beeps on the perceived number of flashes. However, neither younger nor older individuals showed any significant effect of spatial disparity on the sound-induced flash illusion. The presence of a congruent number of beeps increased accuracy for both older and younger individuals. Reaction time data was also analyzed. As expected, older individuals showed significantly longer reaction times when compared to younger individuals. In addition, both older and younger individuals showed a significant increase in reaction time for fusion trials, where two flashes and one beep are perceived as a single flash, as compared to congruent single flash trials. This increase in reaction time was not found for fission trials, where one flash and two beeps were perceived as two flashes. This suggests that processing may differ for the two forms for fission as compared to fusion illusions. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143773 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dentonjdeloss agingspatialdisparityandthesoundinducedflashillusion AT georgejandersen agingspatialdisparityandthesoundinducedflashillusion |
_version_ |
1714824817989910528 |