Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises

Frequency-dependent gain adjustments are routine in hearing-aid fittings, whether in matching to real-ear targets or fine-tuning to patient feedback. Patient feedback may be unreliable and fittings inefficient if adjustments are not discriminable. To examine what gain adjustments are discriminable,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter, William M. Whitmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-01-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518820220
id doaj-696c8361b3e54dbab228c8d308099162
record_format Article
spelling doaj-696c8361b3e54dbab228c8d3080991622020-11-25T03:00:05ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652019-01-012310.1177/2331216518820220Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped NoisesBenjamin Caswell-Midwinter0William M. Whitmer1School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary, and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UKHearing Sciences—Scottish Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Glasgow, UKFrequency-dependent gain adjustments are routine in hearing-aid fittings, whether in matching to real-ear targets or fine-tuning to patient feedback. Patient feedback may be unreliable and fittings inefficient if adjustments are not discriminable. To examine what gain adjustments are discriminable, we measured the just-noticeable differences (JNDs) for level increments in speech-shaped noises processed with prescription gains. JNDs were measured in the better ears of 38 participants with hearing impairment using a fixed-level, same-different task. JNDs were measured for increments at six individual frequency-bands: a 0.25-kHz low-pass band; octave-wide bands at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz; and a 6-kHz high-pass band. JNDs for broadband increments were also measured. JNDs were estimated at d’ of 1 for a minimally discriminable increment in optimal laboratory conditions. The JND for frequency-band increments was 2.8 dB excluding the 0.25-kHz low-pass band, for which the JND was 4.5 dB. The JND for broadband increments was 1.5 dB. Participants’ median frequency-band and broadband JNDs were positively correlated. JNDs were mostly independent of age, pure-tone thresholds, and cognitive score. In consideration of self-fitting adjustments in noisier conditions, JNDs were additionally estimated at a more sensitive d’ of 2. These JNDs were 6 dB for bands below 1 kHz, and 5 dB for bands at and above 1 kHz. Overall, the results suggest noticeable fine-tuning adjustments of 3 dB and self-fitting adjustments of 5 dB.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518820220
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter
William M. Whitmer
spellingShingle Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter
William M. Whitmer
Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter
William M. Whitmer
author_sort Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter
title Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
title_short Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
title_full Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
title_fullStr Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises
title_sort discrimination of gain increments in speech-shaped noises
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Frequency-dependent gain adjustments are routine in hearing-aid fittings, whether in matching to real-ear targets or fine-tuning to patient feedback. Patient feedback may be unreliable and fittings inefficient if adjustments are not discriminable. To examine what gain adjustments are discriminable, we measured the just-noticeable differences (JNDs) for level increments in speech-shaped noises processed with prescription gains. JNDs were measured in the better ears of 38 participants with hearing impairment using a fixed-level, same-different task. JNDs were measured for increments at six individual frequency-bands: a 0.25-kHz low-pass band; octave-wide bands at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz; and a 6-kHz high-pass band. JNDs for broadband increments were also measured. JNDs were estimated at d’ of 1 for a minimally discriminable increment in optimal laboratory conditions. The JND for frequency-band increments was 2.8 dB excluding the 0.25-kHz low-pass band, for which the JND was 4.5 dB. The JND for broadband increments was 1.5 dB. Participants’ median frequency-band and broadband JNDs were positively correlated. JNDs were mostly independent of age, pure-tone thresholds, and cognitive score. In consideration of self-fitting adjustments in noisier conditions, JNDs were additionally estimated at a more sensitive d’ of 2. These JNDs were 6 dB for bands below 1 kHz, and 5 dB for bands at and above 1 kHz. Overall, the results suggest noticeable fine-tuning adjustments of 3 dB and self-fitting adjustments of 5 dB.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518820220
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamincaswellmidwinter discriminationofgainincrementsinspeechshapednoises
AT williammwhitmer discriminationofgainincrementsinspeechshapednoises
_version_ 1724699554054406144