Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis

Purpose. To compare the outcome following lateral plantar nerve release with or without calcaneal drilling for resistant plantar fasciitis. Methods. 30 women and 3 men aged 30 to 60 (mean, 45) years with resistant plantar fasciitis were randomised to undergo release of the first branch of the latera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Fathy Sadek, Ezzat Hassan Fouly, Mostafa Mohammed Elian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901502300226
id doaj-698678f3355641299fd6e2c2b4e284dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-698678f3355641299fd6e2c2b4e284dc2020-11-25T02:52:40ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902015-08-012310.1177/230949901502300226Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar FasciitisAhmed Fathy Sadek0Ezzat Hassan Fouly1Mostafa Mohammed Elian2 Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Minia University Hospital, Egypt Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Minia University Hospital, Egypt Radiology Department, Minia University Hospital, EgyptPurpose. To compare the outcome following lateral plantar nerve release with or without calcaneal drilling for resistant plantar fasciitis. Methods. 30 women and 3 men aged 30 to 60 (mean, 45) years with resistant plantar fasciitis were randomised to undergo release of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve with (group 1, n=18) or without (group 2, n=15) calcaneal drilling. Results. Patients were followed up for a mean of 27 months. According to the modified Mayo scoring system for plantar fasciotomy, group 1 was superior to group 2 in terms of score (93.9±6.97 vs. 83±8.2, p<0.001) and grading (15 excellent, 2 good, and one fair vs. 6 excellent, 4 good, and 5 fair; p=0.031). Three patients in group one and one patient in group 2 (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p=0.381) developed complications of heel numbness, foot oedema, and 2 cases of superficial wound infection, respectively. Conclusion. Adding calcaneal drilling to release of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve achieves better outcome than release alone in patients with resistant plantar fasciitis.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901502300226
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed Fathy Sadek
Ezzat Hassan Fouly
Mostafa Mohammed Elian
spellingShingle Ahmed Fathy Sadek
Ezzat Hassan Fouly
Mostafa Mohammed Elian
Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Ahmed Fathy Sadek
Ezzat Hassan Fouly
Mostafa Mohammed Elian
author_sort Ahmed Fathy Sadek
title Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
title_short Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
title_full Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
title_fullStr Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
title_full_unstemmed Lateral Plantar Nerve Release with or without Calcaneal Drilling for Resistant Plantar Fasciitis
title_sort lateral plantar nerve release with or without calcaneal drilling for resistant plantar fasciitis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Purpose. To compare the outcome following lateral plantar nerve release with or without calcaneal drilling for resistant plantar fasciitis. Methods. 30 women and 3 men aged 30 to 60 (mean, 45) years with resistant plantar fasciitis were randomised to undergo release of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve with (group 1, n=18) or without (group 2, n=15) calcaneal drilling. Results. Patients were followed up for a mean of 27 months. According to the modified Mayo scoring system for plantar fasciotomy, group 1 was superior to group 2 in terms of score (93.9±6.97 vs. 83±8.2, p<0.001) and grading (15 excellent, 2 good, and one fair vs. 6 excellent, 4 good, and 5 fair; p=0.031). Three patients in group one and one patient in group 2 (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p=0.381) developed complications of heel numbness, foot oedema, and 2 cases of superficial wound infection, respectively. Conclusion. Adding calcaneal drilling to release of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve achieves better outcome than release alone in patients with resistant plantar fasciitis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901502300226
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedfathysadek lateralplantarnervereleasewithorwithoutcalcanealdrillingforresistantplantarfasciitis
AT ezzathassanfouly lateralplantarnervereleasewithorwithoutcalcanealdrillingforresistantplantarfasciitis
AT mostafamohammedelian lateralplantarnervereleasewithorwithoutcalcanealdrillingforresistantplantarfasciitis
_version_ 1724728437985247232