Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maja Klančnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Graphic Arts 2015-03-01
Series:Acta Graphica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.actagraphica.hr/index.php/actagraphica/article/view/159
id doaj-69c90c78ccec4f57af5c13cce1814763
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69c90c78ccec4f57af5c13cce18147632020-11-24T22:55:11ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Graphic ArtsActa Graphica0353-47072015-03-01253-47382113Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink WastewaterMaja Klančnik0University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Department of Textiles<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The intention of the study was to improve the efficiency of total organic carbon (TOC) and colour removal from the wastewater samples polluted with flexographic printing ink following coagulation treatments with further adsorption onto activated carbons and ground orange peel. The treatment efficiencies were compared to those of further flocculation treatments and of coagulation and adsorption processes individually. Coagulation was a relatively effective single-treatment method, removing 99.7% of the colour and 86.9% of the organic substances (TOC) from the printing ink wastewater samples. Further flocculation did not further eliminate organic pollutants, whereas subsequent adsorption with 7 g/l of granular activated carbon further reduced organic substances by 35.1%, and adsorption with 7 g/l of powdered activated carbon further reduced organic substances by 59.3%. Orange peel was an inappropriate adsorbent for wastewater samples with low amounts of pollution, such as water that had been treated by coagulation. However, in highly polluted printing ink wastewater samples, the adsorption treatment with ground orange peel achieved efficiencies comparable to those of the granular activated carbon treatments.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>http://www.actagraphica.hr/index.php/actagraphica/article/view/159activated carbonadsorptioncoagulationorange peel, printing inkwastewater
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maja Klančnik
spellingShingle Maja Klančnik
Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
Acta Graphica
activated carbon
adsorption
coagulation
orange peel
, printing ink
wastewater
author_facet Maja Klančnik
author_sort Maja Klančnik
title Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
title_short Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
title_full Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
title_fullStr Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Coagulation and Adsorption Treatment of Printing Ink Wastewater
title_sort coagulation and adsorption treatment of printing ink wastewater
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Graphic Arts
series Acta Graphica
issn 0353-4707
publishDate 2015-03-01
description <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;" lang="EN-GB"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The intention of the study was to improve the efficiency of total organic carbon (TOC) and colour removal from the wastewater samples polluted with flexographic printing ink following coagulation treatments with further adsorption onto activated carbons and ground orange peel. The treatment efficiencies were compared to those of further flocculation treatments and of coagulation and adsorption processes individually. Coagulation was a relatively effective single-treatment method, removing 99.7% of the colour and 86.9% of the organic substances (TOC) from the printing ink wastewater samples. Further flocculation did not further eliminate organic pollutants, whereas subsequent adsorption with 7 g/l of granular activated carbon further reduced organic substances by 35.1%, and adsorption with 7 g/l of powdered activated carbon further reduced organic substances by 59.3%. Orange peel was an inappropriate adsorbent for wastewater samples with low amounts of pollution, such as water that had been treated by coagulation. However, in highly polluted printing ink wastewater samples, the adsorption treatment with ground orange peel achieved efficiencies comparable to those of the granular activated carbon treatments.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>
topic activated carbon
adsorption
coagulation
orange peel
, printing ink
wastewater
url http://www.actagraphica.hr/index.php/actagraphica/article/view/159
work_keys_str_mv AT majaklancnik coagulationandadsorptiontreatmentofprintinginkwastewater
_version_ 1725657569472544768