The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials

Abstract Background Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is wide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suzanne Hartley, Robbie Foy, Rebecca E. A. Walwyn, Robert Cicero, Amanda J. Farrin, Jill J. Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Natalie J. Gould, John Grant-Casey, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Liz Glidewell, Susan Michie, Stephen Morris, Simon J. Stanworth, for the AFFINITIE programme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:Implementation Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8
id doaj-69d9bfe3738a4eacbbe002af8376cd65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69d9bfe3738a4eacbbe002af8376cd652020-11-25T00:32:15ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082017-07-0112111110.1186/s13012-017-0614-8The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trialsSuzanne Hartley0Robbie Foy1Rebecca E. A. Walwyn2Robert Cicero3Amanda J. Farrin4Jill J. Francis5Fabiana Lorencatto6Natalie J. Gould7John Grant-Casey8Jeremy M. Grimshaw9Liz Glidewell10Susan Michie11Stephen Morris12Simon J. Stanworth13for the AFFINITIE programmeClinical Trials Research Unit, University of LeedsLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsClinical Trials Research Unit, University of LeedsClinical Trials Research Unit, University of LeedsClinical Trials Research Unit, University of LeedsCentre for Health Services Research, University of LondonCentre for Health Services Research, University of LondonCentre for Health Services Research, University of LondonNHS Blood & TransplantClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College LondonDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College LondonTransfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and TransplantAbstract Background Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. Methods The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. Discussion AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. Trial registration http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8Randomised controlled trialCluster randomisationSplit-block designImplementationAuditBlood transfusion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suzanne Hartley
Robbie Foy
Rebecca E. A. Walwyn
Robert Cicero
Amanda J. Farrin
Jill J. Francis
Fabiana Lorencatto
Natalie J. Gould
John Grant-Casey
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Liz Glidewell
Susan Michie
Stephen Morris
Simon J. Stanworth
for the AFFINITIE programme
spellingShingle Suzanne Hartley
Robbie Foy
Rebecca E. A. Walwyn
Robert Cicero
Amanda J. Farrin
Jill J. Francis
Fabiana Lorencatto
Natalie J. Gould
John Grant-Casey
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Liz Glidewell
Susan Michie
Stephen Morris
Simon J. Stanworth
for the AFFINITIE programme
The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
Implementation Science
Randomised controlled trial
Cluster randomisation
Split-block design
Implementation
Audit
Blood transfusion
author_facet Suzanne Hartley
Robbie Foy
Rebecca E. A. Walwyn
Robert Cicero
Amanda J. Farrin
Jill J. Francis
Fabiana Lorencatto
Natalie J. Gould
John Grant-Casey
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Liz Glidewell
Susan Michie
Stephen Morris
Simon J. Stanworth
for the AFFINITIE programme
author_sort Suzanne Hartley
title The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_short The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_full The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_fullStr The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_sort evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (affinitie): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
publisher BMC
series Implementation Science
issn 1748-5908
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Background Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. Methods The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. Discussion AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. Trial registration http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813
topic Randomised controlled trial
Cluster randomisation
Split-block design
Implementation
Audit
Blood transfusion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8
work_keys_str_mv AT suzannehartley theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT robbiefoy theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT rebeccaeawalwyn theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT robertcicero theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT amandajfarrin theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT jilljfrancis theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT fabianalorencatto theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT nataliejgould theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT johngrantcasey theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT jeremymgrimshaw theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT lizglidewell theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT susanmichie theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT stephenmorris theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT simonjstanworth theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT fortheaffinitieprogramme theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT suzannehartley evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT robbiefoy evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT rebeccaeawalwyn evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT robertcicero evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT amandajfarrin evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT jilljfrancis evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT fabianalorencatto evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT nataliejgould evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT johngrantcasey evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT jeremymgrimshaw evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT lizglidewell evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT susanmichie evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT stephenmorris evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT simonjstanworth evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT fortheaffinitieprogramme evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725320025117556736