Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model

3D whole engine finite element model of a low pressure rotor rig test model is established in this paper. Rotorynamic characteristics are mainly analysed with three models, which include rotor model with static stiffness, rotor model with dynamic stiffness, and whole engine model. The calculation re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song Huiying, Wang Shaohui, Sun Kai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817903012
id doaj-69deac8a931346919dd3d21df47b2370
record_format Article
spelling doaj-69deac8a931346919dd3d21df47b23702021-02-02T05:24:38ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011790301210.1051/matecconf/201817903012matecconf_2mae2018_03012Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test ModelSong HuiyingWang ShaohuiSun Kai3D whole engine finite element model of a low pressure rotor rig test model is established in this paper. Rotorynamic characteristics are mainly analysed with three models, which include rotor model with static stiffness, rotor model with dynamic stiffness, and whole engine model. The calculation results were compared and discussed deeply. Rotordynamic characteristics of rotor model with static stiffness are similar with the rotor model with dynamic stiffness, but the latter may have additional resonance peaks caused by dynamic stiffness. Whole engine model, which can capture the modes of casing and coupling vibration between stator and rotor, may have more critical speeds than rotor model only. The unbalance response amplitude and phase angle of the whole engine model are different with the only rotor model, in the values and distributions of the peaks. The result of rotor model with dynamic stiffness is closed to the whole engine model than the rotor model with static stiffness. The peak values of the whole engine model are smaller than the only rotor model. Rotordynamic characteristics with whole engine model are more accurate than rotor model only, so it necessary to analyse rotordynamic characteristics with whole engine model in detail design stage.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817903012
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Song Huiying
Wang Shaohui
Sun Kai
spellingShingle Song Huiying
Wang Shaohui
Sun Kai
Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Song Huiying
Wang Shaohui
Sun Kai
author_sort Song Huiying
title Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
title_short Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
title_full Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
title_fullStr Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
title_full_unstemmed Rotordynamic Characteristics Analysis for an aero-engine Low Pressure Rotor Rig Test Model
title_sort rotordynamic characteristics analysis for an aero-engine low pressure rotor rig test model
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description 3D whole engine finite element model of a low pressure rotor rig test model is established in this paper. Rotorynamic characteristics are mainly analysed with three models, which include rotor model with static stiffness, rotor model with dynamic stiffness, and whole engine model. The calculation results were compared and discussed deeply. Rotordynamic characteristics of rotor model with static stiffness are similar with the rotor model with dynamic stiffness, but the latter may have additional resonance peaks caused by dynamic stiffness. Whole engine model, which can capture the modes of casing and coupling vibration between stator and rotor, may have more critical speeds than rotor model only. The unbalance response amplitude and phase angle of the whole engine model are different with the only rotor model, in the values and distributions of the peaks. The result of rotor model with dynamic stiffness is closed to the whole engine model than the rotor model with static stiffness. The peak values of the whole engine model are smaller than the only rotor model. Rotordynamic characteristics with whole engine model are more accurate than rotor model only, so it necessary to analyse rotordynamic characteristics with whole engine model in detail design stage.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817903012
work_keys_str_mv AT songhuiying rotordynamiccharacteristicsanalysisforanaeroenginelowpressurerotorrigtestmodel
AT wangshaohui rotordynamiccharacteristicsanalysisforanaeroenginelowpressurerotorrigtestmodel
AT sunkai rotordynamiccharacteristicsanalysisforanaeroenginelowpressurerotorrigtestmodel
_version_ 1724303727442001920