Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue

The aim of this paper was to study fairness in testing by analyzing the quality of subscores for different groups of test takers. This is done by studying the value added ratio (VAR) for all subscores in the test, which here is a Swedish college admission test. Comparisons were made between test tak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Strömbäck Hjärne, Per-Erik Lyrén
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2020.00055/full
id doaj-6a0aa34b572c42448f72ec20c6fd62b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a0aa34b572c42448f72ec20c6fd62b82020-11-25T02:10:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2020-05-01510.3389/feduc.2020.00055529890Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness IssueMarcus Strömbäck HjärnePer-Erik LyrénThe aim of this paper was to study fairness in testing by analyzing the quality of subscores for different groups of test takers. This is done by studying the value added ratio (VAR) for all subscores in the test, which here is a Swedish college admission test. Comparisons were made between test takers who take the regular test and test takers who are taking the test with extended time adaptation, as well as between males and females. Significant group differences in such subscore value would raise questions about fairness for that testing program. In particular, differences in subscore value between subgroups based on accommodations could indicate problems with the appropriateness of the accommodation. We found that the value added ratio (VAR) for all subscores in the studied test were slightly larger for males than for females. There were some differences between subgroups with respect to the extended time accommodation, but they were not systematic in the same way as for males and females. While the differences in the subscores' added value were small in general, they may in some instances be large enough to pose a threat to a valid and fair interpretation and use of test scores, and thus raises questions about fairness.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2020.00055/fullfairnesssubscoresgenderdyslexiatestadaptation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcus Strömbäck Hjärne
Per-Erik Lyrén
spellingShingle Marcus Strömbäck Hjärne
Per-Erik Lyrén
Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
Frontiers in Education
fairness
subscores
gender
dyslexia
test
adaptation
author_facet Marcus Strömbäck Hjärne
Per-Erik Lyrén
author_sort Marcus Strömbäck Hjärne
title Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
title_short Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
title_full Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
title_fullStr Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
title_full_unstemmed Group Differences in the Value of Subscores: A Fairness Issue
title_sort group differences in the value of subscores: a fairness issue
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Education
issn 2504-284X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The aim of this paper was to study fairness in testing by analyzing the quality of subscores for different groups of test takers. This is done by studying the value added ratio (VAR) for all subscores in the test, which here is a Swedish college admission test. Comparisons were made between test takers who take the regular test and test takers who are taking the test with extended time adaptation, as well as between males and females. Significant group differences in such subscore value would raise questions about fairness for that testing program. In particular, differences in subscore value between subgroups based on accommodations could indicate problems with the appropriateness of the accommodation. We found that the value added ratio (VAR) for all subscores in the studied test were slightly larger for males than for females. There were some differences between subgroups with respect to the extended time accommodation, but they were not systematic in the same way as for males and females. While the differences in the subscores' added value were small in general, they may in some instances be large enough to pose a threat to a valid and fair interpretation and use of test scores, and thus raises questions about fairness.
topic fairness
subscores
gender
dyslexia
test
adaptation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2020.00055/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusstrombackhjarne groupdifferencesinthevalueofsubscoresafairnessissue
AT pereriklyren groupdifferencesinthevalueofsubscoresafairnessissue
_version_ 1724919180987203584