Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen

<p>Recent work has highlighted a strong, worldwide, alpine glacial impact on orogen erosion rates over the last 2&thinsp;Ma. While it may be assumed that glaciers increased erosion rates when active, the degree to which past glaciations influence Holocene erosion rates through the adjus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. A. Adams, T. A. Ehlers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-07-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/6/595/2018/esurf-6-595-2018.pdf
id doaj-6a14917464104f6b8fcbff9d54683d96
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a14917464104f6b8fcbff9d54683d962020-11-24T21:40:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2018-07-01659561010.5194/esurf-6-595-2018Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogenB. A. Adams0B. A. Adams1T. A. Ehlers2Department of Geosciences, Universität Tübingen, 72074, Germanynow at: the School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UKDepartment of Geosciences, Universität Tübingen, 72074, Germany<p>Recent work has highlighted a strong, worldwide, alpine glacial impact on orogen erosion rates over the last 2&thinsp;Ma. While it may be assumed that glaciers increased erosion rates when active, the degree to which past glaciations influence Holocene erosion rates through the adjustment of topography is not known. In this study, we investigate the influence of long-term tectonic and post-glacial topographic controls on erosion in a glaciated orogen: the Olympic Mountains, USA. We present 14 new <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al analyses which constrain Holocene erosion rates across the Olympic Mountains. Basin-averaged erosion rates scale with basin-averaged values of 5&thinsp;km local relief, channel steepness, and hillslope angle throughout the range, similar to observations from non-glaciated orogens. These erosion rates are not related to mean annual precipitation or the marked change in Pleistocene alpine glacier size across the range, implying that glacier modification of topography and modern precipitation parameters do not exert strong controls on these rates. Rather, we find that despite spatial variations in glacial modification of topography, patterns of recent erosion are similar to those from estimates of long-term tectonic rock uplift. This is consistent with a tectonic model where erosion and rock uplift patterns are controlled by the deformation of the Cascadia subduction zone.</p>https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/6/595/2018/esurf-6-595-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. A. Adams
B. A. Adams
T. A. Ehlers
spellingShingle B. A. Adams
B. A. Adams
T. A. Ehlers
Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet B. A. Adams
B. A. Adams
T. A. Ehlers
author_sort B. A. Adams
title Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
title_short Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
title_full Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
title_fullStr Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
title_full_unstemmed Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
title_sort tectonic controls of holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2018-07-01
description <p>Recent work has highlighted a strong, worldwide, alpine glacial impact on orogen erosion rates over the last 2&thinsp;Ma. While it may be assumed that glaciers increased erosion rates when active, the degree to which past glaciations influence Holocene erosion rates through the adjustment of topography is not known. In this study, we investigate the influence of long-term tectonic and post-glacial topographic controls on erosion in a glaciated orogen: the Olympic Mountains, USA. We present 14 new <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al analyses which constrain Holocene erosion rates across the Olympic Mountains. Basin-averaged erosion rates scale with basin-averaged values of 5&thinsp;km local relief, channel steepness, and hillslope angle throughout the range, similar to observations from non-glaciated orogens. These erosion rates are not related to mean annual precipitation or the marked change in Pleistocene alpine glacier size across the range, implying that glacier modification of topography and modern precipitation parameters do not exert strong controls on these rates. Rather, we find that despite spatial variations in glacial modification of topography, patterns of recent erosion are similar to those from estimates of long-term tectonic rock uplift. This is consistent with a tectonic model where erosion and rock uplift patterns are controlled by the deformation of the Cascadia subduction zone.</p>
url https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/6/595/2018/esurf-6-595-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT baadams tectoniccontrolsofholoceneerosioninaglaciatedorogen
AT baadams tectoniccontrolsofholoceneerosioninaglaciatedorogen
AT taehlers tectoniccontrolsofholoceneerosioninaglaciatedorogen
_version_ 1725927790305345536