Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of S-Detect when applied to breast ultrasonography (US), and the agreement with an experienced radiologist specializing in breast imaging. Methods From June to August 2015, 192 breast masses in 175 women were included. US f...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Ultrasonography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-16012.pdf |
id |
doaj-6a3dc40e94794c36a9d72e445c421e7b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6a3dc40e94794c36a9d72e445c421e7b2020-11-25T00:36:22ZengKorean Society of Ultrasound in MedicineUltrasonography2288-59192288-59432017-01-013613910.14366/usg.16012134Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologistKiwook Kim0Mi Kyung Song1Eun-Kyung Kim2Jung Hyun Yoon3 Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Seoul, Korea Department of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Seoul, Korea Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Seoul, KoreaPurpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of S-Detect when applied to breast ultrasonography (US), and the agreement with an experienced radiologist specializing in breast imaging. Methods From June to August 2015, 192 breast masses in 175 women were included. US features of the breast masses were retrospectively analyzed by a radiologist who specializes in breast imaging and S-Detect, according to the fourth edition of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon and final assessment categories. Final assessments from S-Detect were in dichotomized form: possibly benign and possibly malignant. Kappa statistics were used to analyze the agreement between the radiologist and S-Detect. Diagnostic performance of the radiologist and S-Detect was calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the receiving operator characteristics curve. Results Of the 192 breast masses, 72 (37.5%) were malignant, and 120 (62.5%) were benign. Benign masses among category 4a had higher rates of possibly benign assessment on S-Detect for the radiologist, 63.5% to 36.5%, respectively (P=0.797). When the cutoff was set at category 4a, the specificity, PPV, and accuracy was significantly higher in S-Detect compared to the radiologist (all P<0.05), with a higher area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.725 compared to 0.653 (P=0.038). Moderate agreement (k=0.58) was seen in the final assessment between the radiologist and S-Detect. Conclusion S-Detect may be used as an additional diagnostic tool to improve the specificity of breast US in clinical practice, and guide in decision making for breast masses detected on US.http://e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-16012.pdfBreastUltrasonographyNeoplasmsBI-RADSDiagnosis, computer-aided |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kiwook Kim Mi Kyung Song Eun-Kyung Kim Jung Hyun Yoon |
spellingShingle |
Kiwook Kim Mi Kyung Song Eun-Kyung Kim Jung Hyun Yoon Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist Ultrasonography Breast Ultrasonography Neoplasms BI-RADS Diagnosis, computer-aided |
author_facet |
Kiwook Kim Mi Kyung Song Eun-Kyung Kim Jung Hyun Yoon |
author_sort |
Kiwook Kim |
title |
Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
title_short |
Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
title_full |
Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
title_fullStr |
Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
title_sort |
clinical application of s-detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist |
publisher |
Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine |
series |
Ultrasonography |
issn |
2288-5919 2288-5943 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of S-Detect when applied to breast ultrasonography (US), and the agreement with an experienced radiologist specializing in breast imaging. Methods From June to August 2015, 192 breast masses in 175 women were included. US features of the breast masses were retrospectively analyzed by a radiologist who specializes in breast imaging and S-Detect, according to the fourth edition of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon and final assessment categories. Final assessments from S-Detect were in dichotomized form: possibly benign and possibly malignant. Kappa statistics were used to analyze the agreement between the radiologist and S-Detect. Diagnostic performance of the radiologist and S-Detect was calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the receiving operator characteristics curve. Results Of the 192 breast masses, 72 (37.5%) were malignant, and 120 (62.5%) were benign. Benign masses among category 4a had higher rates of possibly benign assessment on S-Detect for the radiologist, 63.5% to 36.5%, respectively (P=0.797). When the cutoff was set at category 4a, the specificity, PPV, and accuracy was significantly higher in S-Detect compared to the radiologist (all P<0.05), with a higher area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.725 compared to 0.653 (P=0.038). Moderate agreement (k=0.58) was seen in the final assessment between the radiologist and S-Detect. Conclusion S-Detect may be used as an additional diagnostic tool to improve the specificity of breast US in clinical practice, and guide in decision making for breast masses detected on US. |
topic |
Breast Ultrasonography Neoplasms BI-RADS Diagnosis, computer-aided |
url |
http://e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-16012.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kiwookkim clinicalapplicationofsdetecttobreastmassesonultrasonographyastudyevaluatingthediagnosticperformanceandagreementwithadedicatedbreastradiologist AT mikyungsong clinicalapplicationofsdetecttobreastmassesonultrasonographyastudyevaluatingthediagnosticperformanceandagreementwithadedicatedbreastradiologist AT eunkyungkim clinicalapplicationofsdetecttobreastmassesonultrasonographyastudyevaluatingthediagnosticperformanceandagreementwithadedicatedbreastradiologist AT junghyunyoon clinicalapplicationofsdetecttobreastmassesonultrasonographyastudyevaluatingthediagnosticperformanceandagreementwithadedicatedbreastradiologist |
_version_ |
1725305735865171968 |