Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy

OBJECTIVE: To compare 4 analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. INTRODUCTION: Analytic algorithms were initially developed for interpretation of standard automated perimetry (using a full threshold strategy). The Swedish interactive threshold algorithm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustavo S. Takahashi, Niro Kasahara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2008-01-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000300008
id doaj-6a492c12b15348fda6161161b94ec1dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a492c12b15348fda6161161b94ec1dd2020-11-24T22:57:32ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1807-59321980-53222008-01-0163333333810.1590/S1807-59322008000300008Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategyGustavo S. TakahashiNiro KasaharaOBJECTIVE: To compare 4 analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. INTRODUCTION: Analytic algorithms were initially developed for interpretation of standard automated perimetry (using a full threshold strategy). The Swedish interactive threshold algorithm is a novel strategy that was developed to shorten test duration. METHODS: One hundred forty-three printouts of normal and glaucomatous patients were analyzed using Caprioli's (strict, moderate and liberal) criteria and Anderson's modified criteria for perimetric defect. Areas under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for each criteria were calculated. RESULTS: Caprioli's strict and Anderson's modified criteria presented similar sensitivity (94.5% and 92.3%, respectively) and specificity (63.5% and 61.5%, respectively). Caprioli's liberal criteria were more sensitive (98.9%) and less specific (42.5%) than the other three criteria. CONCLUSION: Both Caprioli's and Anderson's modified criteria can be used for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000300008PerimetrySwedish Interactive Threshold AlgorithmGlaucomaOphthalmologyOptometry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gustavo S. Takahashi
Niro Kasahara
spellingShingle Gustavo S. Takahashi
Niro Kasahara
Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
Clinics
Perimetry
Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm
Glaucoma
Ophthalmology
Optometry
author_facet Gustavo S. Takahashi
Niro Kasahara
author_sort Gustavo S. Takahashi
title Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
title_short Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
title_full Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
title_fullStr Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
title_sort comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
series Clinics
issn 1807-5932
1980-5322
publishDate 2008-01-01
description OBJECTIVE: To compare 4 analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm. INTRODUCTION: Analytic algorithms were initially developed for interpretation of standard automated perimetry (using a full threshold strategy). The Swedish interactive threshold algorithm is a novel strategy that was developed to shorten test duration. METHODS: One hundred forty-three printouts of normal and glaucomatous patients were analyzed using Caprioli's (strict, moderate and liberal) criteria and Anderson's modified criteria for perimetric defect. Areas under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for each criteria were calculated. RESULTS: Caprioli's strict and Anderson's modified criteria presented similar sensitivity (94.5% and 92.3%, respectively) and specificity (63.5% and 61.5%, respectively). Caprioli's liberal criteria were more sensitive (98.9%) and less specific (42.5%) than the other three criteria. CONCLUSION: Both Caprioli's and Anderson's modified criteria can be used for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm.
topic Perimetry
Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm
Glaucoma
Ophthalmology
Optometry
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000300008
work_keys_str_mv AT gustavostakahashi comparisonofdifferentanalyticalgorithmsforinterpretationoftheswedishinteractivethresholdalgorithmstrategy
AT nirokasahara comparisonofdifferentanalyticalgorithmsforinterpretationoftheswedishinteractivethresholdalgorithmstrategy
_version_ 1725650402828877824