Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.

The association between blood pressure (BP) and bladder cancer (BC) risk remains unclear with confounding by smoking being of particular concern. We investigated the association between BP and BC risk among men using conventional survival-analysis, and by Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis in an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanley Teleka, George Hindy, Isabel Drake, Alaitz Poveda, Olle Melander, Fredrik Liedberg, Marju Orho-Melander, Tanja Stocks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241711
id doaj-6a4df0db12c544e08d2b8e4d4645fbc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a4df0db12c544e08d2b8e4d4645fbc02021-03-04T13:05:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024171110.1371/journal.pone.0241711Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.Stanley TelekaGeorge HindyIsabel DrakeAlaitz PovedaOlle MelanderFredrik LiedbergMarju Orho-MelanderTanja StocksThe association between blood pressure (BP) and bladder cancer (BC) risk remains unclear with confounding by smoking being of particular concern. We investigated the association between BP and BC risk among men using conventional survival-analysis, and by Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis in an attempt to disconnect the association from smoking. We additionally investigated the interaction between BP and N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) rs1495741, an established BC genetic risk variant, in the association. Populations consisting of 188,167 men with 502 incident BC's in the UK-biobank and 27,107 men with 928 incident BC's in two Swedish cohorts were used for the analysis. We found a positive association between systolic BP and BC risk in Cox-regression survival analysis in the Swedish cohorts, (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD]: 1.14 [95% confidence interval 1.05-1.22]) and MR analysis (odds ratio per SD: 2-stage least-square regression, 7.70 [1.92-30.9]; inverse-variance weighted estimate, 3.43 [1.12-10.5]), and no associations in the UK-biobank (HR systolic BP: 0.93 [0.85-1.02]; MR OR: 1.24 [0.35-4.40] and 1.37 [0.43-4.37], respectively). BP levels were positively associated with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) (HRs: systolic BP, 1.32 [1.09-1.59]; diastolic BP, 1.27 [1.04-1.55]), but not with non-muscle invasive BC, which could be analyzed in the Swedish cohorts only. There was no interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC on the additive or multiplicative scale. These results suggest that BP might be related to BC, more particularly MIBC. There was no evidence to support interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC in our study.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241711
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanley Teleka
George Hindy
Isabel Drake
Alaitz Poveda
Olle Melander
Fredrik Liedberg
Marju Orho-Melander
Tanja Stocks
spellingShingle Stanley Teleka
George Hindy
Isabel Drake
Alaitz Poveda
Olle Melander
Fredrik Liedberg
Marju Orho-Melander
Tanja Stocks
Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stanley Teleka
George Hindy
Isabel Drake
Alaitz Poveda
Olle Melander
Fredrik Liedberg
Marju Orho-Melander
Tanja Stocks
author_sort Stanley Teleka
title Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
title_short Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
title_full Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
title_fullStr Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.
title_sort blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with nat2 genotype, and by mendelian randomization analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The association between blood pressure (BP) and bladder cancer (BC) risk remains unclear with confounding by smoking being of particular concern. We investigated the association between BP and BC risk among men using conventional survival-analysis, and by Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis in an attempt to disconnect the association from smoking. We additionally investigated the interaction between BP and N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) rs1495741, an established BC genetic risk variant, in the association. Populations consisting of 188,167 men with 502 incident BC's in the UK-biobank and 27,107 men with 928 incident BC's in two Swedish cohorts were used for the analysis. We found a positive association between systolic BP and BC risk in Cox-regression survival analysis in the Swedish cohorts, (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD]: 1.14 [95% confidence interval 1.05-1.22]) and MR analysis (odds ratio per SD: 2-stage least-square regression, 7.70 [1.92-30.9]; inverse-variance weighted estimate, 3.43 [1.12-10.5]), and no associations in the UK-biobank (HR systolic BP: 0.93 [0.85-1.02]; MR OR: 1.24 [0.35-4.40] and 1.37 [0.43-4.37], respectively). BP levels were positively associated with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) (HRs: systolic BP, 1.32 [1.09-1.59]; diastolic BP, 1.27 [1.04-1.55]), but not with non-muscle invasive BC, which could be analyzed in the Swedish cohorts only. There was no interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC on the additive or multiplicative scale. These results suggest that BP might be related to BC, more particularly MIBC. There was no evidence to support interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC in our study.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241711
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleyteleka bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT georgehindy bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT isabeldrake bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT alaitzpoveda bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT ollemelander bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT fredrikliedberg bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT marjuorhomelander bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT tanjastocks bloodpressureandbladdercancerriskinmenbyuseofsurvivalanalysisandininteractionwithnat2genotypeandbymendelianrandomizationanalysis
_version_ 1714800721151393792