Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research

The complexity of sustainable development and societal transitions require both analytical understandings of how coupled human-environment systems function and transdisciplinary science-to-practice approaches. The academic discourse has advanced in developing a framework for defining success in tran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tobias Luthe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/71
id doaj-6a8bba7bd36f4b02bc2b1c16426d3184
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a8bba7bd36f4b02bc2b1c16426d31842020-11-24T21:30:46ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502017-01-01917110.3390/su9010071su9010071Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability ResearchTobias Luthe0Department Living Environment, University of Applied Sciences HTW Chur, 7000 Chur, SwitzerlandThe complexity of sustainable development and societal transitions require both analytical understandings of how coupled human-environment systems function and transdisciplinary science-to-practice approaches. The academic discourse has advanced in developing a framework for defining success in transdisciplinary research (TDR). Further empirical evidence is needed to validate the proposed concepts with TDR case studies. This paper applies a widely used TDR framework to test and critically evaluate its design principles and criteria of success with five TDR case studies the author is intimately familiar with. Overall, the design principles of the framework are validated for the five cases. Additional design principles are derived from the case analysis and proposed to complement the applied framework: (1) A project origin from society as opposed to with and for society; (2) Quickly available initiation funding; (3) Flexibility in time, objectives and methods throughout the research process; (4) Acceptance of process vs. project results; (5) Inclusion of public science communication; and (6) A demand-driven transition to a prolonged or new project partnership. The complementing principles are proposed for integration in the applied framework and are subject to further empirical testing. The reflexive empirical approach I have taken in this paper offers a key step towards removing institutional barriers for successful TDR, demonstrating how conceptual frameworks can be applied.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/71TDR frameworkcase studiesempirical evidencefundingscience from society
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tobias Luthe
spellingShingle Tobias Luthe
Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
Sustainability
TDR framework
case studies
empirical evidence
funding
science from society
author_facet Tobias Luthe
author_sort Tobias Luthe
title Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
title_short Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
title_full Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
title_fullStr Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
title_full_unstemmed Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research
title_sort success in transdisciplinary sustainability research
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The complexity of sustainable development and societal transitions require both analytical understandings of how coupled human-environment systems function and transdisciplinary science-to-practice approaches. The academic discourse has advanced in developing a framework for defining success in transdisciplinary research (TDR). Further empirical evidence is needed to validate the proposed concepts with TDR case studies. This paper applies a widely used TDR framework to test and critically evaluate its design principles and criteria of success with five TDR case studies the author is intimately familiar with. Overall, the design principles of the framework are validated for the five cases. Additional design principles are derived from the case analysis and proposed to complement the applied framework: (1) A project origin from society as opposed to with and for society; (2) Quickly available initiation funding; (3) Flexibility in time, objectives and methods throughout the research process; (4) Acceptance of process vs. project results; (5) Inclusion of public science communication; and (6) A demand-driven transition to a prolonged or new project partnership. The complementing principles are proposed for integration in the applied framework and are subject to further empirical testing. The reflexive empirical approach I have taken in this paper offers a key step towards removing institutional barriers for successful TDR, demonstrating how conceptual frameworks can be applied.
topic TDR framework
case studies
empirical evidence
funding
science from society
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/71
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasluthe successintransdisciplinarysustainabilityresearch
_version_ 1725961792555843584