ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient

Objective: The objective of this preliminary study was to report and compare the peri-operative and functional results of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living-donor robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT), ABO-compatible (ABOc) living-donor RAKT, and ABOi living-donor open kidney transplantation (O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Prudhomme, Arnaud Del Bello, Federico Sallusto, Marine Lesourd, Nassim Kamar, Nicolas Doumerc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00049/full
id doaj-6aab9e62e4774279bfc4b722176af474
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6aab9e62e4774279bfc4b722176af4742020-11-25T03:24:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2020-08-01710.3389/fsurg.2020.00049560843ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese RecipientThomas Prudhomme0Arnaud Del Bello1Federico Sallusto2Marine Lesourd3Nassim Kamar4Nicolas Doumerc5Department of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceDepartment of Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceObjective: The objective of this preliminary study was to report and compare the peri-operative and functional results of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living-donor robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT), ABO-compatible (ABOc) living-donor RAKT, and ABOi living-donor open kidney transplantation (OKT).Materials and Methods: For the present retrospective study, we analyzed data of consecutive patients who underwent ABOi or ABOc-RAKT and ABOi-OKT, from January 2015 to December 2019, in one French academic center. Patients' baseline characteristics, operative, and functional outcomes were compared between ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT.Results: 29 RAKT, including 7 ABOi-RAKT, and 56 ABOi-OKT were performed in our center. Median follow-up was 2.0 years. Median recipient age, pre-emptive kidney transplantation rate, sex ratio and desensitization procedures were similar in ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT groups. Recipient BMI at transplantation was statistically higher in ABOi and ABOc-RAKT groups compared to ABOi-OKT. The surgical site complication (principally infection-related) rate was lower in ABOi-RAKT, without statistical differences (0 vs. 8.9%, respectively, in ABOi-RAKT and ABOi-OKT, p = 0.7). The delayed graft function rate was 0% in ABOi-RAKT, 13.6% in ABOc-RAKT, and 10.7% in ABOi-OKT (p = 0.6). The post-transplantation blood transfusion rate was statistically higher in the ABOi-OKT group (14.3 vs. 13.6 vs. 57.1% in ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT, respectively, p = 0.001). The kidney graft survival at 1 month and at last follow-up was not different between ABOi-RAKT and ABOi-OKT.Conclusion: Our data support the use of ABOi-RAKT to restore accessibility to kidney transplantation for obese patients to the greatest extent possible. Large series are required to confirm these encouraging data from a single center.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00049/fullrobotic-assisted kidney transplantationABO-incompatibleopen kidney transplantationdesensitization protocolsdelayed graft function
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Prudhomme
Arnaud Del Bello
Federico Sallusto
Marine Lesourd
Nassim Kamar
Nicolas Doumerc
spellingShingle Thomas Prudhomme
Arnaud Del Bello
Federico Sallusto
Marine Lesourd
Nassim Kamar
Nicolas Doumerc
ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
Frontiers in Surgery
robotic-assisted kidney transplantation
ABO-incompatible
open kidney transplantation
desensitization protocols
delayed graft function
author_facet Thomas Prudhomme
Arnaud Del Bello
Federico Sallusto
Marine Lesourd
Nassim Kamar
Nicolas Doumerc
author_sort Thomas Prudhomme
title ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
title_short ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
title_full ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
title_fullStr ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
title_full_unstemmed ABO-Incompatible Robotic-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in the Obese Recipient
title_sort abo-incompatible robotic-assisted kidney transplantation in the obese recipient
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Surgery
issn 2296-875X
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Objective: The objective of this preliminary study was to report and compare the peri-operative and functional results of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living-donor robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT), ABO-compatible (ABOc) living-donor RAKT, and ABOi living-donor open kidney transplantation (OKT).Materials and Methods: For the present retrospective study, we analyzed data of consecutive patients who underwent ABOi or ABOc-RAKT and ABOi-OKT, from January 2015 to December 2019, in one French academic center. Patients' baseline characteristics, operative, and functional outcomes were compared between ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT.Results: 29 RAKT, including 7 ABOi-RAKT, and 56 ABOi-OKT were performed in our center. Median follow-up was 2.0 years. Median recipient age, pre-emptive kidney transplantation rate, sex ratio and desensitization procedures were similar in ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT groups. Recipient BMI at transplantation was statistically higher in ABOi and ABOc-RAKT groups compared to ABOi-OKT. The surgical site complication (principally infection-related) rate was lower in ABOi-RAKT, without statistical differences (0 vs. 8.9%, respectively, in ABOi-RAKT and ABOi-OKT, p = 0.7). The delayed graft function rate was 0% in ABOi-RAKT, 13.6% in ABOc-RAKT, and 10.7% in ABOi-OKT (p = 0.6). The post-transplantation blood transfusion rate was statistically higher in the ABOi-OKT group (14.3 vs. 13.6 vs. 57.1% in ABOi-RAKT, ABOc-RAKT, and ABOi-OKT, respectively, p = 0.001). The kidney graft survival at 1 month and at last follow-up was not different between ABOi-RAKT and ABOi-OKT.Conclusion: Our data support the use of ABOi-RAKT to restore accessibility to kidney transplantation for obese patients to the greatest extent possible. Large series are required to confirm these encouraging data from a single center.
topic robotic-assisted kidney transplantation
ABO-incompatible
open kidney transplantation
desensitization protocols
delayed graft function
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00049/full
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasprudhomme aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
AT arnauddelbello aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
AT federicosallusto aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
AT marinelesourd aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
AT nassimkamar aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
AT nicolasdoumerc aboincompatibleroboticassistedkidneytransplantationintheobeserecipient
_version_ 1724599660874563584