Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dauro Douglas Oliveira, Thomas Gerard Bradley, Matheus Melo Pithon, Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo, Emílio Akaki, Virendra Dhuru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015-10-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857
id doaj-6ab94466608041f3b95e8922dcc59c12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ab94466608041f3b95e8922dcc59c122021-07-15T14:04:18ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-10-0113410.20396/bjos.v13i4.8640857Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic bracketsDauro Douglas Oliveira0Thomas Gerard Bradley1Matheus Melo Pithon2Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo3Emílio Akaki4Virendra Dhuru5Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasMarquette UniversityUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESBPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasMarquette UniversityAim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments: conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond® and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule®), washing time and drying of the surface. Results: A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857Glass ionomer cementsShear strengthDental bondingOrthodontic brackets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Thomas Gerard Bradley
Matheus Melo Pithon
Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo
Emílio Akaki
Virendra Dhuru
spellingShingle Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Thomas Gerard Bradley
Matheus Melo Pithon
Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo
Emílio Akaki
Virendra Dhuru
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Glass ionomer cements
Shear strength
Dental bonding
Orthodontic brackets
author_facet Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Thomas Gerard Bradley
Matheus Melo Pithon
Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo
Emílio Akaki
Virendra Dhuru
author_sort Dauro Douglas Oliveira
title Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
title_short Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
title_full Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
title_fullStr Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
title_sort effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Aim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments: conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond® and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule®), washing time and drying of the surface. Results: A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets.
topic Glass ionomer cements
Shear strength
Dental bonding
Orthodontic brackets
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857
work_keys_str_mv AT daurodouglasoliveira effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
AT thomasgerardbradley effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
AT matheusmelopithon effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
AT marielecristinagarciapantuzo effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
AT emilioakaki effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
AT virendradhuru effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets
_version_ 1721300251874164736