Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets
Aim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857 |
id |
doaj-6ab94466608041f3b95e8922dcc59c12 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ab94466608041f3b95e8922dcc59c122021-07-15T14:04:18ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-10-0113410.20396/bjos.v13i4.8640857Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic bracketsDauro Douglas Oliveira0Thomas Gerard Bradley1Matheus Melo Pithon2Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo3Emílio Akaki4Virendra Dhuru5Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasMarquette UniversityUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia - UESBPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC MinasMarquette UniversityAim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments: conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond® and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule®), washing time and drying of the surface. Results: A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857Glass ionomer cementsShear strengthDental bondingOrthodontic brackets |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dauro Douglas Oliveira Thomas Gerard Bradley Matheus Melo Pithon Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo Emílio Akaki Virendra Dhuru |
spellingShingle |
Dauro Douglas Oliveira Thomas Gerard Bradley Matheus Melo Pithon Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo Emílio Akaki Virendra Dhuru Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Glass ionomer cements Shear strength Dental bonding Orthodontic brackets |
author_facet |
Dauro Douglas Oliveira Thomas Gerard Bradley Matheus Melo Pithon Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo Emílio Akaki Virendra Dhuru |
author_sort |
Dauro Douglas Oliveira |
title |
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
title_short |
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
title_full |
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
title_sort |
effect of different enamel conditionings on the bond strength of glass ionomer cement and ceramic brackets |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
issn |
1677-3225 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
Aim: To evaluate the effect of different enamel conditionings on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure patterns of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) used to bond ceramic brackets. Methods: 105 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 7 groups according to the enamel surface treatments: conditioners (35% phosphoric acid and 10% polyacrylic acid), type of adhesive (Transbond® and Fuji Ortho LC Capsule®), washing time and drying of the surface. Results: A significant p<0.05 was observed among the shear bond strength values obtained with seven different types of enamel preparation prior to bonding. The group that had the tooth surface conditioned with polyacrylic acid and enamel surface slightly dried before bracket placement showed no significant difference (p>0.05) to the group that had brackets bonded with composite resin. The two groups that had enamel prepared with polyacrylic acid and brackets bonded with GIC on a wet surface showed significantly lower shear bond strength than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Moisture contamination decreased SBS, but not enough to preclude the use of RMGIC as an alternative to composite resin (CR) for direct bonding of ceramic brackets. |
topic |
Glass ionomer cements Shear strength Dental bonding Orthodontic brackets |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640857 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT daurodouglasoliveira effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets AT thomasgerardbradley effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets AT matheusmelopithon effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets AT marielecristinagarciapantuzo effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets AT emilioakaki effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets AT virendradhuru effectofdifferentenamelconditioningsonthebondstrengthofglassionomercementandceramicbrackets |
_version_ |
1721300251874164736 |