Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?

The research question of this study is: are the revisions of an anonymous Romanian forecaster more accurate than the initial predictions for the current year? Therefore, in order to provide a scientific response to this question, several macroeconomic variables were considered for the crisis period...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simionescu M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Transilvania University Press 2014-12-01
Series:Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V : Economic Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/2014/Series_V/BULETIN%20V/V-04_SIMIONESCU-v2.pdf
id doaj-6abdbc901d894f729414ca6f5de9fd00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6abdbc901d894f729414ca6f5de9fd002020-11-24T23:16:57ZengTransilvania University PressBulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V : Economic Sciences2065-21942065-21942014-12-017(56)2243248Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?Simionescu MThe research question of this study is: are the revisions of an anonymous Romanian forecaster more accurate than the initial predictions for the current year? Therefore, in order to provide a scientific response to this question, several macroeconomic variables were considered for the crisis period (2009-2013): real GDP growth, inflation rate, unemployment rate and exchange rate. The forecasts are provided for the current year in two versions: spring variant and autumn one. For 2009, the real GDP growth and unemployment rate revisions brought higher errors. Indeed, the crisis start was not precisely anticipated by the expert. For unemployment rate in each year belonging to the period 2009-2012 the revisions showed higher errors. According to predictions accuracy indicators, the forecaster was one which best predicted the exchange rate during 2009-2013. For this variable, all the accuracy measures have the lowest values. All the predictions for all the variables outperformed the naïve forecasts. According to the Harvey-Leybourne-Newbold test, there are not significant differences in accuracy between the initial and the revised forecasts of the real GDP rate and the inflation rate between 2009-2013. http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/2014/Series_V/BULETIN%20V/V-04_SIMIONESCU-v2.pdfforecastsaccuracyerrorrevisions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simionescu M
spellingShingle Simionescu M
Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V : Economic Sciences
forecasts
accuracy
error
revisions
author_facet Simionescu M
author_sort Simionescu M
title Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
title_short Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
title_full Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
title_fullStr Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
title_full_unstemmed Are the revised Forecasts for Romania more accurate than the Preliminary ones during the Crisis?
title_sort are the revised forecasts for romania more accurate than the preliminary ones during the crisis?
publisher Transilvania University Press
series Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V : Economic Sciences
issn 2065-2194
2065-2194
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The research question of this study is: are the revisions of an anonymous Romanian forecaster more accurate than the initial predictions for the current year? Therefore, in order to provide a scientific response to this question, several macroeconomic variables were considered for the crisis period (2009-2013): real GDP growth, inflation rate, unemployment rate and exchange rate. The forecasts are provided for the current year in two versions: spring variant and autumn one. For 2009, the real GDP growth and unemployment rate revisions brought higher errors. Indeed, the crisis start was not precisely anticipated by the expert. For unemployment rate in each year belonging to the period 2009-2012 the revisions showed higher errors. According to predictions accuracy indicators, the forecaster was one which best predicted the exchange rate during 2009-2013. For this variable, all the accuracy measures have the lowest values. All the predictions for all the variables outperformed the naïve forecasts. According to the Harvey-Leybourne-Newbold test, there are not significant differences in accuracy between the initial and the revised forecasts of the real GDP rate and the inflation rate between 2009-2013.
topic forecasts
accuracy
error
revisions
url http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/2014/Series_V/BULETIN%20V/V-04_SIMIONESCU-v2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT simionescum aretherevisedforecastsforromaniamoreaccuratethanthepreliminaryonesduringthecrisis
_version_ 1725585600008945664