Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.

Studies of mating preferences and pre-mating reproductive isolation have often focused on females, but the potential importance of male preferences is increasingly appreciated. We investigated male behavior in the context of reproductive isolation between divergent anadromous and stream-resident pop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey S McKinnon, Nick Hamele, Nicole Frey, Jennifer Chou, Leia McAleavey, Jess Greene, Windi Paulson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3372497?pdf=render
id doaj-6abeee52367c414eb290b85e76f426dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6abeee52367c414eb290b85e76f426dc2020-11-25T01:42:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3795110.1371/journal.pone.0037951Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.Jeffrey S McKinnonNick HameleNicole FreyJennifer ChouLeia McAleaveyJess GreeneWindi PaulsonStudies of mating preferences and pre-mating reproductive isolation have often focused on females, but the potential importance of male preferences is increasingly appreciated. We investigated male behavior in the context of reproductive isolation between divergent anadromous and stream-resident populations of threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, using size-manipulated females of both ecotypes. Specifically, we asked if male courtship preferences are present, and if they are based on relative body size, non-size aspects of ecotype, or other traits. Because male behaviors were correlated with each other, we conducted a principal components analysis on the correlations and ran subsequent analyses on the principal components. The two male ecotypes differed in overall behavioral frequencies, with stream-resident males exhibiting consistently more vigorous and positive courtship than anadromous males, and an otherwise aggressive behavior playing a more positive role in anadromous than stream-resident courtship. We observed more vigorous courtship toward smaller females by (relatively small) stream-resident males and the reverse pattern for (relatively large) anadromous males. Thus size-assortative male courtship preferences may contribute to reproductive isolation in this system, although preferences are far from absolute. We found little indication of males responding preferentially to females of their own ecotype independent of body size.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3372497?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeffrey S McKinnon
Nick Hamele
Nicole Frey
Jennifer Chou
Leia McAleavey
Jess Greene
Windi Paulson
spellingShingle Jeffrey S McKinnon
Nick Hamele
Nicole Frey
Jennifer Chou
Leia McAleavey
Jess Greene
Windi Paulson
Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jeffrey S McKinnon
Nick Hamele
Nicole Frey
Jennifer Chou
Leia McAleavey
Jess Greene
Windi Paulson
author_sort Jeffrey S McKinnon
title Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
title_short Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
title_full Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
title_fullStr Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
title_full_unstemmed Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
title_sort male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Studies of mating preferences and pre-mating reproductive isolation have often focused on females, but the potential importance of male preferences is increasingly appreciated. We investigated male behavior in the context of reproductive isolation between divergent anadromous and stream-resident populations of threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, using size-manipulated females of both ecotypes. Specifically, we asked if male courtship preferences are present, and if they are based on relative body size, non-size aspects of ecotype, or other traits. Because male behaviors were correlated with each other, we conducted a principal components analysis on the correlations and ran subsequent analyses on the principal components. The two male ecotypes differed in overall behavioral frequencies, with stream-resident males exhibiting consistently more vigorous and positive courtship than anadromous males, and an otherwise aggressive behavior playing a more positive role in anadromous than stream-resident courtship. We observed more vigorous courtship toward smaller females by (relatively small) stream-resident males and the reverse pattern for (relatively large) anadromous males. Thus size-assortative male courtship preferences may contribute to reproductive isolation in this system, although preferences are far from absolute. We found little indication of males responding preferentially to females of their own ecotype independent of body size.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3372497?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreysmckinnon malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT nickhamele malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT nicolefrey malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT jenniferchou malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT leiamcaleavey malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT jessgreene malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
AT windipaulson malechoiceinthestreamanadromoussticklebackcomplex
_version_ 1725035516025372672