Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues

Studies investigating the effects of observing a gaze shift in another person often apply static images of a person with an averted gaze, while measuring response times to a peripheral target. Static images, however, are unlike how we normally perceive gaze shifts of others. Moreover, response times...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frouke Hermens, Robin Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2012-11-01
Series:Journal of Eye Movement Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2348
id doaj-6ae01af936284cfdae86dcf408a3e68f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ae01af936284cfdae86dcf408a3e68f2021-05-28T13:34:28ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922012-11-015510.16910/jemr.5.5.5Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cuesFrouke Hermens0Robin Walker1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London & University of Aberdeen, UKDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK,Studies investigating the effects of observing a gaze shift in another person often apply static images of a person with an averted gaze, while measuring response times to a peripheral target. Static images, however, are unlike how we normally perceive gaze shifts of others. Moreover, response times might only reveal the effects of a cue on covert attention and might fail to uncover cueing effects on overt attention or response preparation. We therefore extended the standard paradigm and measured cueing effects formore realistic, dynamic cues (video clips),while comparing response times, saccade direction errors and saccade trajectories. Three cues were compared: A social cue, consisting of a eye-gaze shift, and two socially less relevant cues, consisting of a head tilting movement and a person walking past. Similar results were found for the two centrally presented cues (eye-gaze shift and head tilting) on all three response measures, suggesting that cueing is unaffected by the social status of the cue. Interestingly, the cue showing a person walking past showed a dissociation in the direction of the effects on response times on the one hand, and saccade direction errors and latencies on the other hand, suggesting the involvement of two types of (endogenous and exogenous) attention or a distinction between attention and sacadic response preparation. Our results suggest that by using dynamic cues and multiple response measures, properties of cueing can be revealed that would not be found otherwise.https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2348social attentioneye movementsresponse timessaccade trajectory deviationsdynamic cues
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frouke Hermens
Robin Walker
spellingShingle Frouke Hermens
Robin Walker
Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
Journal of Eye Movement Research
social attention
eye movements
response times
saccade trajectory deviations
dynamic cues
author_facet Frouke Hermens
Robin Walker
author_sort Frouke Hermens
title Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
title_short Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
title_full Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
title_fullStr Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
title_full_unstemmed Do you look where I look? Attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
title_sort do you look where i look? attention shifts and response preparation following dynamic social cues
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Journal of Eye Movement Research
issn 1995-8692
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Studies investigating the effects of observing a gaze shift in another person often apply static images of a person with an averted gaze, while measuring response times to a peripheral target. Static images, however, are unlike how we normally perceive gaze shifts of others. Moreover, response times might only reveal the effects of a cue on covert attention and might fail to uncover cueing effects on overt attention or response preparation. We therefore extended the standard paradigm and measured cueing effects formore realistic, dynamic cues (video clips),while comparing response times, saccade direction errors and saccade trajectories. Three cues were compared: A social cue, consisting of a eye-gaze shift, and two socially less relevant cues, consisting of a head tilting movement and a person walking past. Similar results were found for the two centrally presented cues (eye-gaze shift and head tilting) on all three response measures, suggesting that cueing is unaffected by the social status of the cue. Interestingly, the cue showing a person walking past showed a dissociation in the direction of the effects on response times on the one hand, and saccade direction errors and latencies on the other hand, suggesting the involvement of two types of (endogenous and exogenous) attention or a distinction between attention and sacadic response preparation. Our results suggest that by using dynamic cues and multiple response measures, properties of cueing can be revealed that would not be found otherwise.
topic social attention
eye movements
response times
saccade trajectory deviations
dynamic cues
url https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2348
work_keys_str_mv AT froukehermens doyoulookwhereilookattentionshiftsandresponsepreparationfollowingdynamicsocialcues
AT robinwalker doyoulookwhereilookattentionshiftsandresponsepreparationfollowingdynamicsocialcues
_version_ 1721423687926677504