Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> There is general agreement on the benefits of laparoscopy for treatment of rectal and left colon cancers, whereas findings regarding the comparison of laparoscopic and open right colonic resections are discordant. The aim of this systematic review and me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudio F. Feo, Panagiotis Paliogiannis, Alessandro Fancellu, Angelo Zinellu, Giorgio C. Ginesu, Carlo V. Feo, Alberto Porcu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/57/1/80
id doaj-6b0d928796cb4ae28a6a597d05122e98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b0d928796cb4ae28a6a597d05122e982021-01-20T00:00:44ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2021-01-0157808010.3390/medicina57010080Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisClaudio F. Feo0Panagiotis Paliogiannis1Alessandro Fancellu2Angelo Zinellu3Giorgio C. Ginesu4Carlo V. Feo5Alberto Porcu6Unit of General Surgery 2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyUnit of General Surgery 2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyUnit of General Surgery 2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, ItalyUnit of General Surgery, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, ItalyUnit of General Surgery 2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy<i>Background and Objectives:</i> There is general agreement on the benefits of laparoscopy for treatment of rectal and left colon cancers, whereas findings regarding the comparison of laparoscopic and open right colonic resections are discordant. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes and advantages of laparoscopic versus transverse-incision open surgery for management of right colon cancer. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating the results of laparoscopic and transverse-incision open right hemicolectomies were analyzed. The measured outcomes were mean operative time, time to feeding, duration of hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested. <i>Results:</i> A total of 5 studies including 318 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed no differences in time to resume oral feeding, hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested in between groups, but mean length of surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. <i>Conclusion:</i> These data confirm that the preferred approach to right hemicolectomy is yet unclear. Laparoscopy has a longer operative time than transverse-incision open surgery, and no significant short-term benefits were observed for the studied parameters. Well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs) might help to identify the differences between these two techniques for the surgical treatment of right colon cancer.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/57/1/80colon cancerright colectomylaparoscopylaparotomytransverse incisionopen surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claudio F. Feo
Panagiotis Paliogiannis
Alessandro Fancellu
Angelo Zinellu
Giorgio C. Ginesu
Carlo V. Feo
Alberto Porcu
spellingShingle Claudio F. Feo
Panagiotis Paliogiannis
Alessandro Fancellu
Angelo Zinellu
Giorgio C. Ginesu
Carlo V. Feo
Alberto Porcu
Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Medicina
colon cancer
right colectomy
laparoscopy
laparotomy
transverse incision
open surgery
author_facet Claudio F. Feo
Panagiotis Paliogiannis
Alessandro Fancellu
Angelo Zinellu
Giorgio C. Ginesu
Carlo V. Feo
Alberto Porcu
author_sort Claudio F. Feo
title Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort laparoscopic versus open transverse-incision approach for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <i>Background and Objectives:</i> There is general agreement on the benefits of laparoscopy for treatment of rectal and left colon cancers, whereas findings regarding the comparison of laparoscopic and open right colonic resections are discordant. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes and advantages of laparoscopic versus transverse-incision open surgery for management of right colon cancer. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating the results of laparoscopic and transverse-incision open right hemicolectomies were analyzed. The measured outcomes were mean operative time, time to feeding, duration of hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested. <i>Results:</i> A total of 5 studies including 318 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed no differences in time to resume oral feeding, hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested in between groups, but mean length of surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. <i>Conclusion:</i> These data confirm that the preferred approach to right hemicolectomy is yet unclear. Laparoscopy has a longer operative time than transverse-incision open surgery, and no significant short-term benefits were observed for the studied parameters. Well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs) might help to identify the differences between these two techniques for the surgical treatment of right colon cancer.
topic colon cancer
right colectomy
laparoscopy
laparotomy
transverse incision
open surgery
url https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/57/1/80
work_keys_str_mv AT claudioffeo laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panagiotispaliogiannis laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alessandrofancellu laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT angelozinellu laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT giorgiocginesu laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carlovfeo laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT albertoporcu laparoscopicversusopentransverseincisionapproachforrighthemicolectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724331612957573120