Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)

Abstract In this paper, we provide two new Triassic palaeomagnetic poles from Winterswijk, the Netherlands, in the stable interior of the Eurasian plate. They were respectively collected from the Anisian (~ 247–242 Ma) red marly limestones of the sedimentary transition of the Buntsandstein Formation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen, Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen, Cor G. Langereis, Mark J. Dekkers, Bas Zanderink, Martijn H. L. Deenen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Palaeogeography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42501-019-0046-2
id doaj-6b0dc4bbe98f4933bb789136cd7f6ccd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b0dc4bbe98f4933bb789136cd7f6ccd2020-11-25T04:06:09ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Palaeogeography2524-45072019-11-018111510.1186/s42501-019-0046-2Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen0Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen1Cor G. Langereis2Mark J. Dekkers3Bas Zanderink4Martijn H. L. Deenen5Fioretti CollegeDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht UniversityAbstract In this paper, we provide two new Triassic palaeomagnetic poles from Winterswijk, the Netherlands, in the stable interior of the Eurasian plate. They were respectively collected from the Anisian (~ 247–242 Ma) red marly limestones of the sedimentary transition of the Buntsandstein Formation to the dark grey limestones of the basal Muschelkalk Formation, and from the Rhaetian (~ 208–201 Ma) shallow marine claystones that unconformably overlie the Muschelkalk Formation. The magnetization is carried by hematite or magnetite in the Anisian limestones, and iron sulfides and magnetite in the Rhaetian sedimentary rocks, revealing for both a large normal polarity overprint with a recent (geocentric axial dipole field) direction at the present latitude of the locality. Alternating field and thermal demagnetization occasionally reveal a stable magnetization decaying towards the origin, interpreted as the Characteristic Remanent Magnetization. Where we find a pervasive (normal polarity) overprint, we can often still determine well-defined great-circle solutions. Our interpreted palaeomagnetic poles include the great-circle solutions. The Anisian magnetic pole has declination D ± ∆Dx = 210.8 ± 3.0°, inclination I ± ∆Ix = − 26.7 ± 4.9°, with a latitude, longitude of 45.0°, 142.0° respectively, K = 43.9, A95 = 2.9°, N = 56. The Rhaetian magnetic pole has declination D ± ∆Dx = 32.0 ± 8.7°, inclination I ± ∆Ix = 50.9 ± 8.1°, with a latitude, longitude of 60.6°, 123.9° respectively, K = 19.3, A95 = 7.4°, N = 21. The poles plot close to the predicted location of global apparent polar wander paths (GAPWaPs) in Eurasian coordinates and are feasible for future apparent polar wander path construction. They confirm that the intracontinental, shallow-marine Germanic Basin, in which the Muschelkalk Formation was deposited, existed at a palaeolatitude of 14.1° [11.3, 17.1] N, in a palaeo-environment reminding of the Persian Gulf today. In Rhaetian times, palaeolatitudes of 31.6° [24.8, 39.8] N were reached, on its way to the modern latitude of 52°N.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42501-019-0046-2PalaeomagneticPalaeolatitudeAnisianRhaetianMuschelkalk FormationGermanic Basin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen
Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen
Cor G. Langereis
Mark J. Dekkers
Bas Zanderink
Martijn H. L. Deenen
spellingShingle Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen
Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen
Cor G. Langereis
Mark J. Dekkers
Bas Zanderink
Martijn H. L. Deenen
Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
Journal of Palaeogeography
Palaeomagnetic
Palaeolatitude
Anisian
Rhaetian
Muschelkalk Formation
Germanic Basin
author_facet Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen
Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen
Cor G. Langereis
Mark J. Dekkers
Bas Zanderink
Martijn H. L. Deenen
author_sort Lars P. P. van Hinsbergen
title Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
title_short Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
title_full Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
title_fullStr Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
title_full_unstemmed Triassic (Anisian and Rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the Germanic Basin (Winterswijk, the Netherlands)
title_sort triassic (anisian and rhaetian) palaeomagnetic poles from the germanic basin (winterswijk, the netherlands)
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Palaeogeography
issn 2524-4507
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract In this paper, we provide two new Triassic palaeomagnetic poles from Winterswijk, the Netherlands, in the stable interior of the Eurasian plate. They were respectively collected from the Anisian (~ 247–242 Ma) red marly limestones of the sedimentary transition of the Buntsandstein Formation to the dark grey limestones of the basal Muschelkalk Formation, and from the Rhaetian (~ 208–201 Ma) shallow marine claystones that unconformably overlie the Muschelkalk Formation. The magnetization is carried by hematite or magnetite in the Anisian limestones, and iron sulfides and magnetite in the Rhaetian sedimentary rocks, revealing for both a large normal polarity overprint with a recent (geocentric axial dipole field) direction at the present latitude of the locality. Alternating field and thermal demagnetization occasionally reveal a stable magnetization decaying towards the origin, interpreted as the Characteristic Remanent Magnetization. Where we find a pervasive (normal polarity) overprint, we can often still determine well-defined great-circle solutions. Our interpreted palaeomagnetic poles include the great-circle solutions. The Anisian magnetic pole has declination D ± ∆Dx = 210.8 ± 3.0°, inclination I ± ∆Ix = − 26.7 ± 4.9°, with a latitude, longitude of 45.0°, 142.0° respectively, K = 43.9, A95 = 2.9°, N = 56. The Rhaetian magnetic pole has declination D ± ∆Dx = 32.0 ± 8.7°, inclination I ± ∆Ix = 50.9 ± 8.1°, with a latitude, longitude of 60.6°, 123.9° respectively, K = 19.3, A95 = 7.4°, N = 21. The poles plot close to the predicted location of global apparent polar wander paths (GAPWaPs) in Eurasian coordinates and are feasible for future apparent polar wander path construction. They confirm that the intracontinental, shallow-marine Germanic Basin, in which the Muschelkalk Formation was deposited, existed at a palaeolatitude of 14.1° [11.3, 17.1] N, in a palaeo-environment reminding of the Persian Gulf today. In Rhaetian times, palaeolatitudes of 31.6° [24.8, 39.8] N were reached, on its way to the modern latitude of 52°N.
topic Palaeomagnetic
Palaeolatitude
Anisian
Rhaetian
Muschelkalk Formation
Germanic Basin
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42501-019-0046-2
work_keys_str_mv AT larsppvanhinsbergen triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
AT douwejjvanhinsbergen triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
AT corglangereis triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
AT markjdekkers triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
AT baszanderink triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
AT martijnhldeenen triassicanisianandrhaetianpalaeomagneticpolesfromthegermanicbasinwinterswijkthenetherlands
_version_ 1724432114224463872