Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes. Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patien...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746
|
id |
doaj-6b2ce377c05f439fade7e3d7cc754d15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6b2ce377c05f439fade7e3d7cc754d152020-11-25T03:34:51ZengFoundation for Rehabilitation InformationJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine1650-19771651-20812020-10-015210jrm0011310.2340/16501977-27462709Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomesAnne Durand0Line D'AmoursAnnie GirouxMaryse PelletierJean LeblondCarol L. Richards Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale (Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec), G1M 2S8 Quebec City, Canada. Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes. Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patients. Methods: Rehabilitation professionals assessed both groups at admission and discharge using a standard-ized assessment toolkit. Benchmarks for length of rehabilitation stay (LoRS) were introduced based on median severity-specific LoRSs in the control group. The multidisciplinary team documented facilitators and obstacles affecting the prediction of patient benchmark attainment. Categorical variables were compared using a χ2 test with exact probabilities. Ordinal and continuous variables were analysed using rank-based non-parametric analysis of variance. Effect sizes were estimated using a relative treatment effect statistic. Results: The mean combined length of stay in acute care and rehabilitation beds for the experimental group (82 days) was shorter (p = 0.0084) than that of the control group (103 days). This 21-day reduction in combined length of stay included a 10-day reduction in the mean time between stroke onset and admission to the stroke rehabilitation unit (p = 0.000014). Improvements in 6 func-tional and sensorimotor outcomes with rehabilitation were of similar magnitude in both groups, while Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) efficiency improved (p = 0.022). The team was 87% successful in predicting which patients were discharged on the LoRS benchmark. Conclusion: Benchmarking the length of stay in rehabilitation resulted in reduced bed occupation and system costs without adversely affecting functional and sensorimotor patient outcomes. https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746 stroke inpatient rehabilitation quality improvement length of stay benchmarking |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anne Durand Line D'Amours Annie Giroux Maryse Pelletier Jean Leblond Carol L. Richards |
spellingShingle |
Anne Durand Line D'Amours Annie Giroux Maryse Pelletier Jean Leblond Carol L. Richards Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine stroke inpatient rehabilitation quality improvement length of stay benchmarking |
author_facet |
Anne Durand Line D'Amours Annie Giroux Maryse Pelletier Jean Leblond Carol L. Richards |
author_sort |
Anne Durand |
title |
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
title_short |
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
title_full |
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
title_fullStr |
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
title_sort |
benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes |
publisher |
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information |
series |
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine |
issn |
1650-1977 1651-2081 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes.
Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patients.
Methods: Rehabilitation professionals assessed both groups at admission and discharge using a standard-ized assessment toolkit. Benchmarks for length of rehabilitation stay (LoRS) were introduced based on median severity-specific LoRSs in the control group. The multidisciplinary team documented facilitators and obstacles affecting the prediction of patient benchmark attainment. Categorical variables were compared using a χ2 test with exact probabilities. Ordinal and continuous variables were analysed using rank-based non-parametric analysis of variance. Effect sizes were estimated using a relative treatment effect statistic.
Results: The mean combined length of stay in acute care and rehabilitation beds for the experimental group (82 days) was shorter (p = 0.0084) than that of the control group (103 days). This 21-day reduction in combined length of stay included a 10-day reduction in the mean time between stroke onset and admission to the stroke rehabilitation unit (p = 0.000014). Improvements in 6 func-tional and sensorimotor outcomes with rehabilitation were of similar magnitude in both groups, while Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) efficiency improved (p = 0.022). The team was 87% successful in predicting which patients were discharged on the LoRS benchmark.
Conclusion: Benchmarking the length of stay in rehabilitation resulted in reduced bed occupation and system costs without adversely affecting functional and sensorimotor patient outcomes. |
topic |
stroke inpatient rehabilitation quality improvement length of stay benchmarking |
url |
https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746
|
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annedurand benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes AT linedamours benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes AT anniegiroux benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes AT marysepelletier benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes AT jeanleblond benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes AT carollrichards benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes |
_version_ |
1724557139294289920 |