Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes

Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes. Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Durand, Line D'Amours, Annie Giroux, Maryse Pelletier, Jean Leblond, Carol L. Richards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access: https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746
id doaj-6b2ce377c05f439fade7e3d7cc754d15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b2ce377c05f439fade7e3d7cc754d152020-11-25T03:34:51ZengFoundation for Rehabilitation InformationJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine1650-19771651-20812020-10-015210jrm0011310.2340/16501977-27462709Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomesAnne Durand0Line D'AmoursAnnie GirouxMaryse PelletierJean LeblondCarol L. Richards Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale (Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec), G1M 2S8 Quebec City, Canada. Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes. Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patients. Methods: Rehabilitation professionals assessed both groups at admission and discharge using a standard-ized assessment toolkit. Benchmarks for length of rehabilitation stay (LoRS) were introduced based on median severity-specific LoRSs in the control group. The multidisciplinary team documented facilitators and obstacles affecting the prediction of patient benchmark attainment. Categorical variables were compared using a χ2 test with exact probabilities. Ordinal and continuous variables were analysed using rank-based non-parametric analysis of variance. Effect sizes were estimated using a relative treatment effect statistic. Results: The mean combined length of stay in acute care and rehabilitation beds for the experimental group (82 days) was shorter (p = 0.0084) than that of the control group (103 days). This 21-day reduction in combined length of stay included a 10-day reduction in the mean time between stroke onset and admission to the stroke rehabilitation unit (p = 0.000014). Improvements in 6 func-tional and sensorimotor outcomes with rehabilitation were of similar magnitude in both groups, while Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) efficiency improved (p = 0.022). The team was 87% successful in predicting which patients were discharged on the LoRS benchmark. Conclusion: Benchmarking the length of stay in rehabilitation resulted in reduced bed occupation and system costs without adversely affecting functional and sensorimotor patient outcomes. https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746 stroke inpatient rehabilitation quality improvement length of stay benchmarking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Durand
Line D'Amours
Annie Giroux
Maryse Pelletier
Jean Leblond
Carol L. Richards
spellingShingle Anne Durand
Line D'Amours
Annie Giroux
Maryse Pelletier
Jean Leblond
Carol L. Richards
Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
stroke
inpatient rehabilitation
quality improvement
length of stay
benchmarking
author_facet Anne Durand
Line D'Amours
Annie Giroux
Maryse Pelletier
Jean Leblond
Carol L. Richards
author_sort Anne Durand
title Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
title_short Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
title_full Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
title_fullStr Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
title_sort benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes
publisher Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
series Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
issn 1650-1977
1651-2081
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Objective: To evaluate the effects of introducing the practice of targeting a discharge date for patients admitted to an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit on process and patient outcomes. Design: Comparison of retrospective (control group n = 69) and prospective (experimental group n = 60) patients. Methods: Rehabilitation professionals assessed both groups at admission and discharge using a standard-ized assessment toolkit. Benchmarks for length of rehabilitation stay (LoRS) were introduced based on median severity-specific LoRSs in the control group. The multidisciplinary team documented facilitators and obstacles affecting the prediction of patient benchmark attainment. Categorical variables were compared using a χ2 test with exact probabilities. Ordinal and continuous variables were analysed using rank-based non-parametric analysis of variance. Effect sizes were estimated using a relative treatment effect statistic. Results: The mean combined length of stay in acute care and rehabilitation beds for the experimental group (82 days) was shorter (p = 0.0084) than that of the control group (103 days). This 21-day reduction in combined length of stay included a 10-day reduction in the mean time between stroke onset and admission to the stroke rehabilitation unit (p = 0.000014). Improvements in 6 func-tional and sensorimotor outcomes with rehabilitation were of similar magnitude in both groups, while Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) efficiency improved (p = 0.022). The team was 87% successful in predicting which patients were discharged on the LoRS benchmark. Conclusion: Benchmarking the length of stay in rehabilitation resulted in reduced bed occupation and system costs without adversely affecting functional and sensorimotor patient outcomes.
topic stroke
inpatient rehabilitation
quality improvement
length of stay
benchmarking
url https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2746
work_keys_str_mv AT annedurand benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
AT linedamours benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
AT anniegiroux benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
AT marysepelletier benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
AT jeanleblond benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
AT carollrichards benchmarkinglengthofstayforinpatientstrokerehabilitationwithoutadverselyaffectingfunctionaloutcomes
_version_ 1724557139294289920