Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County

Vehicular collisions with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are a safety and economic hazard to motorists. Many efforts to reduce deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) have proven unsuccessful, but deer reduction has been a primary management tool in several states. The Virginia Department of Tran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William J. McShea, Chad M. Stewart, Laura J. Kearns, Stefano Liccioli, David Kocka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017-02-01
Series:Human-Wildlife Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol2/iss1/18
id doaj-6b7dd51c75b744d79651379be968e90a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b7dd51c75b744d79651379be968e90a2020-11-25T03:49:38ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-02-012110.26077/a4k8-m030Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia CountyWilliam J. McShea0Chad M. Stewart1Laura J. Kearns2Stefano Liccioli3David Kocka4National Zoological ParkNational Zoological ParkNational Zoological ParkNational Zoological ParkVirginia Department of Game and Inland FisheriesVehicular collisions with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are a safety and economic hazard to motorists. Many efforts to reduce deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) have proven unsuccessful, but deer reduction has been a primary management tool in several states. The Virginia Department of Transportation geo-located all known DVCs in Clarke County, Virginia, from August through December 2005 (n = 246) and 2006 (n = 259). We estimated harvest intensity, deer population density, amount of forest and housing development, presence of row crops, and traffic volume and speed for 228 road segments (each 500 m in length) within the county to determine which factors are correlated with increased DVCs. A step-wise general linear model indicated that deer density (range 5–47 deer/km2), and deer harvest levels (range 1–18 deer/km2 for 9-km2 blocks) were not correlated with the location of DVCs. Road attributes (traffic volume and road type) and the amount of housing development were important attributes of road segments when predicting DVCs. The locations of DVCs during the rut were not markedly different from collisions outside the rut. Over the range of deer densities and harvest levels found in this rural county, there was little evidence that these factors influence the number of DVCs. Management efforts should include changing motorist behavior or road attributes. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol2/iss1/18deer densitydeer–vehicle collisionhuman–wildlife conflictodocoileus virginianusvirginiawhite-tailed deerwildlife damage management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William J. McShea
Chad M. Stewart
Laura J. Kearns
Stefano Liccioli
David Kocka
spellingShingle William J. McShea
Chad M. Stewart
Laura J. Kearns
Stefano Liccioli
David Kocka
Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
Human-Wildlife Interactions
deer density
deer–vehicle collision
human–wildlife conflict
odocoileus virginianus
virginia
white-tailed deer
wildlife damage management
author_facet William J. McShea
Chad M. Stewart
Laura J. Kearns
Stefano Liccioli
David Kocka
author_sort William J. McShea
title Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
title_short Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
title_full Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Autumn Deer–Vehicle Collisions in a Rural Virginia County
title_sort factors affecting autumn deer–vehicle collisions in a rural virginia county
publisher Utah State University
series Human-Wildlife Interactions
issn 2155-3874
2155-3874
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Vehicular collisions with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are a safety and economic hazard to motorists. Many efforts to reduce deer–vehicle collisions (DVCs) have proven unsuccessful, but deer reduction has been a primary management tool in several states. The Virginia Department of Transportation geo-located all known DVCs in Clarke County, Virginia, from August through December 2005 (n = 246) and 2006 (n = 259). We estimated harvest intensity, deer population density, amount of forest and housing development, presence of row crops, and traffic volume and speed for 228 road segments (each 500 m in length) within the county to determine which factors are correlated with increased DVCs. A step-wise general linear model indicated that deer density (range 5–47 deer/km2), and deer harvest levels (range 1–18 deer/km2 for 9-km2 blocks) were not correlated with the location of DVCs. Road attributes (traffic volume and road type) and the amount of housing development were important attributes of road segments when predicting DVCs. The locations of DVCs during the rut were not markedly different from collisions outside the rut. Over the range of deer densities and harvest levels found in this rural county, there was little evidence that these factors influence the number of DVCs. Management efforts should include changing motorist behavior or road attributes.
topic deer density
deer–vehicle collision
human–wildlife conflict
odocoileus virginianus
virginia
white-tailed deer
wildlife damage management
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol2/iss1/18
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjmcshea factorsaffectingautumndeervehiclecollisionsinaruralvirginiacounty
AT chadmstewart factorsaffectingautumndeervehiclecollisionsinaruralvirginiacounty
AT laurajkearns factorsaffectingautumndeervehiclecollisionsinaruralvirginiacounty
AT stefanoliccioli factorsaffectingautumndeervehiclecollisionsinaruralvirginiacounty
AT davidkocka factorsaffectingautumndeervehiclecollisionsinaruralvirginiacounty
_version_ 1724494271417942016