Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep

Introduction The aim of this study is to examine electrophysiological responses in the brain to painless somatosensory stimulation during sleep. Materials and Methods Fifteen healthy volunteers (8 female, with mean age: 22.13±1.41) participated in the study. Recordings were carried out using Nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonca Inanç, Murat Özgören, Adile Öniz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2014-04-01
Series:Türk Uyku Tıbbı Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jtsm.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/non-painful-tactile-stimuli-and-sleep/7683
id doaj-6bc1b2316df8426195476a2c4f056c49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6bc1b2316df8426195476a2c4f056c492020-11-24T22:09:08ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Uyku Tıbbı Dergisi2148-15042014-04-011191510.4274/jtsm.02Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and SleepGonca InançMurat ÖzgörenAdile ÖnizIntroduction The aim of this study is to examine electrophysiological responses in the brain to painless somatosensory stimulation during sleep. Materials and Methods Fifteen healthy volunteers (8 female, with mean age: 22.13±1.41) participated in the study. Recordings were carried out using NuAmps 40 channeled recording system, pneumatic stimulation unit (Somatosensory Stimulus Generator 4-D Neuroimaging), Embedded Microcontroller Stimulation Unit (EMISU), and additional equipment such as video recording system and analysis computer. Painless air pressure stimulation was applied at constant pressure rate to the fore and middle fingers of the right hand. Infrequent oddball stimulation was applied to one of the fingers (%25 of the time). Continuous electroencephalography (EEG), electrooculography (EOG) and electromyography (EMG) recordings were sorted into sleep phases according to the guidelines set by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). Responses recorded from the C3 and C4 electrodes were examined as somatosensory regions of priority. Paired samples T-tests were used for statistical analysis. Results N100, P200, N300, P450, N550, P900 Nlate wave forms were clearly observed for both frequent and infrequent stimuli in light and deep sleep. Responses to both target and non-target stimuli on the right hand were found to be similar to each other. Discussion Brain responsiveness continues in sleep; however electrophysiological response pattern can vary. Furthermore as processes such as directed attention, stimulus discrimination and working memory cannot be voluntarily employed during sleep; responses to both kinds of stimuli are similar to one another.http://jtsm.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/non-painful-tactile-stimuli-and-sleep/7683Sleepelectroencephalographysomatosensory event related potentialelectrophysiology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gonca Inanç
Murat Özgören
Adile Öniz
spellingShingle Gonca Inanç
Murat Özgören
Adile Öniz
Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
Türk Uyku Tıbbı Dergisi
Sleep
electroencephalography
somatosensory event related potential
electrophysiology
author_facet Gonca Inanç
Murat Özgören
Adile Öniz
author_sort Gonca Inanç
title Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
title_short Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
title_full Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
title_fullStr Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
title_full_unstemmed Non-Painful Tactile Stimuli and Sleep
title_sort non-painful tactile stimuli and sleep
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
series Türk Uyku Tıbbı Dergisi
issn 2148-1504
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Introduction The aim of this study is to examine electrophysiological responses in the brain to painless somatosensory stimulation during sleep. Materials and Methods Fifteen healthy volunteers (8 female, with mean age: 22.13±1.41) participated in the study. Recordings were carried out using NuAmps 40 channeled recording system, pneumatic stimulation unit (Somatosensory Stimulus Generator 4-D Neuroimaging), Embedded Microcontroller Stimulation Unit (EMISU), and additional equipment such as video recording system and analysis computer. Painless air pressure stimulation was applied at constant pressure rate to the fore and middle fingers of the right hand. Infrequent oddball stimulation was applied to one of the fingers (%25 of the time). Continuous electroencephalography (EEG), electrooculography (EOG) and electromyography (EMG) recordings were sorted into sleep phases according to the guidelines set by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). Responses recorded from the C3 and C4 electrodes were examined as somatosensory regions of priority. Paired samples T-tests were used for statistical analysis. Results N100, P200, N300, P450, N550, P900 Nlate wave forms were clearly observed for both frequent and infrequent stimuli in light and deep sleep. Responses to both target and non-target stimuli on the right hand were found to be similar to each other. Discussion Brain responsiveness continues in sleep; however electrophysiological response pattern can vary. Furthermore as processes such as directed attention, stimulus discrimination and working memory cannot be voluntarily employed during sleep; responses to both kinds of stimuli are similar to one another.
topic Sleep
electroencephalography
somatosensory event related potential
electrophysiology
url http://jtsm.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/non-painful-tactile-stimuli-and-sleep/7683
work_keys_str_mv AT goncainanc nonpainfultactilestimuliandsleep
AT muratozgoren nonpainfultactilestimuliandsleep
AT adileoniz nonpainfultactilestimuliandsleep
_version_ 1725813452336791552