Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making

The author focuses the main attention on the people’s everyday reasoning and its mechanism developing the idea that the human mind influenced by the bounded rationality does not always use the logical tools to make a decision. More precisely, the author is talking about the deductive reasoning cheri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nataliia Reva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology 2018-11-01
Series:Future Human Image
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.fhijournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/FHI_10_Reva.pdf
id doaj-6c18aa1f92634efbbb07e56dde900ab7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c18aa1f92634efbbb07e56dde900ab72021-01-09T16:41:29ZengInternational Society of Philosophy and CosmologyFuture Human Image2311-88222519-26042018-11-0110768410.29202/fhi/10/8Logic, Reasoning, Decision-MakingNataliia Reva0Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivThe author focuses the main attention on the people’s everyday reasoning and its mechanism developing the idea that the human mind influenced by the bounded rationality does not always use the logical tools to make a decision. More precisely, the author is talking about the deductive reasoning cherished by Aristotle and its place in real-life reasoning. The main questions raised in this paper are: (1) Does Aristotelian syllogism work for real life? (2) Are we the rational creatures with the “computer mind”? (3) What differs us from the Artificial Intelligence in the decision-making process? Comparing the processing work of a computer program, especially the Artificial Intelligence, with the everyday reasoning of the human mind, the author comes to the conclusion that Aristotelian logic has a more significant impact on the development of the AI than on human thinking. One of the main reasons is that the machines, no matter how advanced they are, are free from the external influences. They use the program put in their mainboard without “thinking” of the outcomes. They do not care if the results of their calculations or actions hurt someone. For example, those new autonomous cars with the movement detectors enable the driver to sleep during the trip, because the machine is driving for you, steering wheel angle, checking the road conditions and correcting the path itself. At the same time, it will not think of your body position and will you be hurt or not in case of the abrupt stop when the child appears in front of the car. It does as it was programed (or how it had learn) to do. While human can use different tools to reach their goal and make the decisions in real life. People do not stay rational all the time and, unlike the machines, can use intuition or do some moves without thinking just by force of habit. These unconscious forces can both help and hurt human decisions.http://www.fhijournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/FHI_10_Reva.pdflogicsyllogismdeductive reasoningbounded rationalitydecision-makingArtificial Intelligence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nataliia Reva
spellingShingle Nataliia Reva
Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
Future Human Image
logic
syllogism
deductive reasoning
bounded rationality
decision-making
Artificial Intelligence
author_facet Nataliia Reva
author_sort Nataliia Reva
title Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
title_short Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
title_full Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
title_fullStr Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making
title_sort logic, reasoning, decision-making
publisher International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology
series Future Human Image
issn 2311-8822
2519-2604
publishDate 2018-11-01
description The author focuses the main attention on the people’s everyday reasoning and its mechanism developing the idea that the human mind influenced by the bounded rationality does not always use the logical tools to make a decision. More precisely, the author is talking about the deductive reasoning cherished by Aristotle and its place in real-life reasoning. The main questions raised in this paper are: (1) Does Aristotelian syllogism work for real life? (2) Are we the rational creatures with the “computer mind”? (3) What differs us from the Artificial Intelligence in the decision-making process? Comparing the processing work of a computer program, especially the Artificial Intelligence, with the everyday reasoning of the human mind, the author comes to the conclusion that Aristotelian logic has a more significant impact on the development of the AI than on human thinking. One of the main reasons is that the machines, no matter how advanced they are, are free from the external influences. They use the program put in their mainboard without “thinking” of the outcomes. They do not care if the results of their calculations or actions hurt someone. For example, those new autonomous cars with the movement detectors enable the driver to sleep during the trip, because the machine is driving for you, steering wheel angle, checking the road conditions and correcting the path itself. At the same time, it will not think of your body position and will you be hurt or not in case of the abrupt stop when the child appears in front of the car. It does as it was programed (or how it had learn) to do. While human can use different tools to reach their goal and make the decisions in real life. People do not stay rational all the time and, unlike the machines, can use intuition or do some moves without thinking just by force of habit. These unconscious forces can both help and hurt human decisions.
topic logic
syllogism
deductive reasoning
bounded rationality
decision-making
Artificial Intelligence
url http://www.fhijournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/FHI_10_Reva.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliiareva logicreasoningdecisionmaking
_version_ 1724343982070169600