Logic and Intensionality
There are different ways we use the expressions “extension” and “intension”. I specify in the first part of this paper two basic senses of this distinction, and try to show that the old metaphysical sense, by means of particular instance vs. universal, is more fundamental than the contemporary sense...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19666 |
id |
doaj-6c3518fb13fd4db0a055f7b687580e1b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6c3518fb13fd4db0a055f7b687580e1b2020-11-25T00:44:53ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology1414-42471808-17112010-01-011411112410.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n1p11115172Logic and IntensionalityGuido Imaguire0Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)There are different ways we use the expressions “extension” and “intension”. I specify in the first part of this paper two basic senses of this distinction, and try to show that the old metaphysical sense, by means of particular instance vs. universal, is more fundamental than the contemporary sense by means of substitutivity. In the second part, I argue that logic in general is essentially intensional, not only because logic is a rule-guided activity, but because even the extensional definition of a logic system presupposes an intensional notion of logical consequence.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19666extensãointensãoconseqüência lógica. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guido Imaguire |
spellingShingle |
Guido Imaguire Logic and Intensionality Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology extensão intensão conseqüência lógica. |
author_facet |
Guido Imaguire |
author_sort |
Guido Imaguire |
title |
Logic and Intensionality |
title_short |
Logic and Intensionality |
title_full |
Logic and Intensionality |
title_fullStr |
Logic and Intensionality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Logic and Intensionality |
title_sort |
logic and intensionality |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
series |
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
issn |
1414-4247 1808-1711 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
There are different ways we use the expressions “extension” and “intension”. I specify in the first part of this paper two basic senses of this distinction, and try to show that the old metaphysical sense, by means of particular instance vs. universal, is more fundamental than the contemporary sense by means of substitutivity. In the second part, I argue that logic in general is essentially intensional, not only because logic is a rule-guided activity, but because even the extensional definition of a logic system presupposes an intensional notion of logical consequence. |
topic |
extensão intensão conseqüência lógica. |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19666 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guidoimaguire logicandintensionality |
_version_ |
1725272691703808000 |