Patient, sufferer, victim, casualty or person with cervical myelopathy: let us decide our identifier

Among biomedical journals, person-first language is considered preferable to identity person-first language. However, not all populations of people with certain medical diagnoses, such as deafness, prefer person-first language. Moreover, adherence to person-first language is poor among the literatur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin M Davies, Iwan Sadler, Ellen Sarewitz, Timothy F Boerger, Mark R N Kotter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:Integrated Healthcare Journal
Online Access:https://ihj.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000023.full
Description
Summary:Among biomedical journals, person-first language is considered preferable to identity person-first language. However, not all populations of people with certain medical diagnoses, such as deafness, prefer person-first language. Moreover, adherence to person-first language is poor among the literature on some neurological diagnoses. Therefore, it is most appropriate to consult with people with a given diagnosis regarding their preferred identifier. Here, we describe a consensus process undertaken by the REsearch objectives and COmmon Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (RECODE-DCM, recode-dcm.com) steering committee members with cervical myelopathy to determine our preferred identifier.
ISSN:2399-5351