Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)

Between December 2000 and January 2005, the Ba‘thist government promulgated a series of political decisions (taqârîr) and decrees aimed at privatising all state farms in Syria. The principle decree, decision number 83, promulgated on December 16, 2000, allocates land in shares of 3 ha for irrigated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Myriam Ababsa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Provence 2006-12-01
Series:Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/remmm/3033
id doaj-6cbe4ba42d2b4d528475c96985125456
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cbe4ba42d2b4d528475c969851254562020-12-17T13:31:01ZengUniversité de ProvenceRevue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée0997-13272105-22712006-12-0111521123010.4000/remmm.3033Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)Myriam AbabsaBetween December 2000 and January 2005, the Ba‘thist government promulgated a series of political decisions (taqârîr) and decrees aimed at privatising all state farms in Syria. The principle decree, decision number 83, promulgated on December 16, 2000, allocates land in shares of 3 ha for irrigated land and 8 ha for non-irrigated land. Decision 83 called for land to be distributed by order of priority, to landholders expropriated in the agrarian reforms of 1958, 1963 and 1966, to farm workers and to employees of the General Administration of the Euphrates Basin (GADEB). In January 2005, 12,500 beneficiaries received 38,500 ha. Half of them were former landowners or beneficiaries of the earlier land reforms, a third were sharecroppers with leaseholds and a fifth were workers and GADEB employees. This paper explores the legislative principles of this decision and its impact on agrarian structures and social hierarchies in the Syrian Jazira. The process is used as a case study of a counter-reform that marks the end of the socialist Ba‘thist ideology. The primary beneficiaries of the reform process are not the traditional rural constituents of the Ba’th party, but a re-emergent class of latifundists tied to the central state and to traditional power structures.http://journals.openedition.org/remmm/3033
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Myriam Ababsa
spellingShingle Myriam Ababsa
Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
author_facet Myriam Ababsa
author_sort Myriam Ababsa
title Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
title_short Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
title_full Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
title_fullStr Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
title_full_unstemmed Contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en Jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
title_sort contre-réforme agraire et conflits fonciers en jazîra syrienne (2000-2005)
publisher Université de Provence
series Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée
issn 0997-1327
2105-2271
publishDate 2006-12-01
description Between December 2000 and January 2005, the Ba‘thist government promulgated a series of political decisions (taqârîr) and decrees aimed at privatising all state farms in Syria. The principle decree, decision number 83, promulgated on December 16, 2000, allocates land in shares of 3 ha for irrigated land and 8 ha for non-irrigated land. Decision 83 called for land to be distributed by order of priority, to landholders expropriated in the agrarian reforms of 1958, 1963 and 1966, to farm workers and to employees of the General Administration of the Euphrates Basin (GADEB). In January 2005, 12,500 beneficiaries received 38,500 ha. Half of them were former landowners or beneficiaries of the earlier land reforms, a third were sharecroppers with leaseholds and a fifth were workers and GADEB employees. This paper explores the legislative principles of this decision and its impact on agrarian structures and social hierarchies in the Syrian Jazira. The process is used as a case study of a counter-reform that marks the end of the socialist Ba‘thist ideology. The primary beneficiaries of the reform process are not the traditional rural constituents of the Ba’th party, but a re-emergent class of latifundists tied to the central state and to traditional power structures.
url http://journals.openedition.org/remmm/3033
work_keys_str_mv AT myriamababsa contrereformeagraireetconflitsfonciersenjazirasyrienne20002005
_version_ 1724379385741443072