Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment

People experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming others after they experience (un)fair treatment. Across three financially incentiviz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margarita Leib, Simone Moran, Shaul Shalvi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2019-07-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190419/jdm190419.pdf
id doaj-6cd1dc266a8e41c480522e42070cd184
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cd1dc266a8e41c480522e42070cd1842021-05-02T11:58:57ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752019-07-01144423439Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatmentMargarita LeibSimone MoranShaul ShalviPeople experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming others after they experience (un)fair treatment. Across three financially incentivized experiments, recipients in a dictator game received a fair or unfair amount and then could, by means of dishonesty, inflate or deflate their counterparts’ pay. Results show that dishonest helping is a common and robust behavior. Individuals lie to help others after fair, unfair, and no prior treatment. Dishonest harming, however, is less prevalent. Only after unfair treatment, some, but not all, individuals engage in dishonest harming. Dishonest harming was associated with high levels of anger and disappointment, and low levels of gratitude. Interestingly, the source of (un)fairness, whether it is intentional or not, did not attenuate peoples’ behavior, suggesting that dishonest reactions to (un)fairness were driven by the mere (un)fair treatment, and not by a motivation to reciprocate an (un)fair counterpart.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190419/jdm190419.pdfbehavioral ethics fairness dishonest behavior decision makingNAKeywords
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margarita Leib
Simone Moran
Shaul Shalvi
spellingShingle Margarita Leib
Simone Moran
Shaul Shalvi
Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
Judgment and Decision Making
behavioral ethics
fairness
dishonest behavior
decision makingNAKeywords
author_facet Margarita Leib
Simone Moran
Shaul Shalvi
author_sort Margarita Leib
title Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
title_short Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
title_full Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
title_fullStr Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
title_full_unstemmed Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
title_sort dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2019-07-01
description People experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming others after they experience (un)fair treatment. Across three financially incentivized experiments, recipients in a dictator game received a fair or unfair amount and then could, by means of dishonesty, inflate or deflate their counterparts’ pay. Results show that dishonest helping is a common and robust behavior. Individuals lie to help others after fair, unfair, and no prior treatment. Dishonest harming, however, is less prevalent. Only after unfair treatment, some, but not all, individuals engage in dishonest harming. Dishonest harming was associated with high levels of anger and disappointment, and low levels of gratitude. Interestingly, the source of (un)fairness, whether it is intentional or not, did not attenuate peoples’ behavior, suggesting that dishonest reactions to (un)fairness were driven by the mere (un)fair treatment, and not by a motivation to reciprocate an (un)fair counterpart.
topic behavioral ethics
fairness
dishonest behavior
decision makingNAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190419/jdm190419.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT margaritaleib dishonesthelpingandharmingafterunfairtreatment
AT simonemoran dishonesthelpingandharmingafterunfairtreatment
AT shaulshalvi dishonesthelpingandharmingafterunfairtreatment
_version_ 1721491607601020928