Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
<p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern US by...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Earth Surface Dynamics |
Online Access: | https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-6d155b5c678a480e8f788e718527ee2b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d155b5c678a480e8f788e718527ee2b2020-11-24T22:04:02ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2019-05-01742943810.5194/esurf-7-429-2019Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts modelE. E. Lentz0N. G. Plant1E. R. Thieler2U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USAU.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA<p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern US by exploring several data inputs and outcomes. Using elevation and land cover datasets, we determine where data error is likely, quantify its effect on predictions, and evaluate its influence on prediction confidence. Results show data error is concentrated in low-lying areas with little impact on prediction skill, as the inherent correlation between the datasets can be exploited to reduce data uncertainty using Bayesian inference. This suggests the approach may be extended to regions with limited data availability and/or poor quality. Furthermore, we verify that model sensitivity in these first-order landscape change assessments is well-matched to larger coastal process uncertainties, for which process-based models are important complements to further reduce uncertainty.</p>https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. E. Lentz N. G. Plant E. R. Thieler |
spellingShingle |
E. E. Lentz N. G. Plant E. R. Thieler Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model Earth Surface Dynamics |
author_facet |
E. E. Lentz N. G. Plant E. R. Thieler |
author_sort |
E. E. Lentz |
title |
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
title_short |
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
title_full |
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
title_fullStr |
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
title_sort |
relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Earth Surface Dynamics |
issn |
2196-6311 2196-632X |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
<p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to
sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to
capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a
model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the
northeastern US by exploring several data inputs and outcomes. Using
elevation and land cover datasets, we determine where data error is likely,
quantify its effect on predictions, and evaluate its influence on prediction
confidence. Results show data error is concentrated in low-lying areas with
little impact on prediction skill, as the inherent correlation between the
datasets can be exploited to reduce data uncertainty using Bayesian
inference. This suggests the approach may be extended to regions with
limited data availability and/or poor quality. Furthermore, we verify that
model sensitivity in these first-order landscape change assessments is
well-matched to larger coastal process uncertainties, for which
process-based models are important complements to further reduce
uncertainty.</p> |
url |
https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eelentz relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel AT ngplant relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel AT erthieler relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel |
_version_ |
1725830906977976320 |