Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model

<p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern US by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. E. Lentz, N. G. Plant, E. R. Thieler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-05-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf
id doaj-6d155b5c678a480e8f788e718527ee2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d155b5c678a480e8f788e718527ee2b2020-11-24T22:04:02ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2019-05-01742943810.5194/esurf-7-429-2019Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts modelE. E. Lentz0N. G. Plant1E. R. Thieler2U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USAU.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA<p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern US by exploring several data inputs and outcomes. Using elevation and land cover datasets, we determine where data error is likely, quantify its effect on predictions, and evaluate its influence on prediction confidence. Results show data error is concentrated in low-lying areas with little impact on prediction skill, as the inherent correlation between the datasets can be exploited to reduce data uncertainty using Bayesian inference. This suggests the approach may be extended to regions with limited data availability and/or poor quality. Furthermore, we verify that model sensitivity in these first-order landscape change assessments is well-matched to larger coastal process uncertainties, for which process-based models are important complements to further reduce uncertainty.</p>https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. E. Lentz
N. G. Plant
E. R. Thieler
spellingShingle E. E. Lentz
N. G. Plant
E. R. Thieler
Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet E. E. Lentz
N. G. Plant
E. R. Thieler
author_sort E. E. Lentz
title Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
title_short Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
title_full Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
title_fullStr Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
title_sort relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2019-05-01
description <p>Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate the sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern US by exploring several data inputs and outcomes. Using elevation and land cover datasets, we determine where data error is likely, quantify its effect on predictions, and evaluate its influence on prediction confidence. Results show data error is concentrated in low-lying areas with little impact on prediction skill, as the inherent correlation between the datasets can be exploited to reduce data uncertainty using Bayesian inference. This suggests the approach may be extended to regions with limited data availability and/or poor quality. Furthermore, we verify that model sensitivity in these first-order landscape change assessments is well-matched to larger coastal process uncertainties, for which process-based models are important complements to further reduce uncertainty.</p>
url https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/429/2019/esurf-7-429-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eelentz relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel
AT ngplant relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel
AT erthieler relationshipsbetweenregionalcoastallandcoverdistributionsandelevationrevealdatauncertaintyinasealevelriseimpactsmodel
_version_ 1725830906977976320