Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

  Background: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: GOUTAM DATTA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indonesian Heart Association 2021-03-01
Series:Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/987
id doaj-6d18dfb3109c4a979ad6c33b9b814d52
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d18dfb3109c4a979ad6c33b9b814d522021-03-05T07:57:03ZengIndonesian Heart AssociationMajalah Kardiologi Indonesia0126-37732620-47622021-03-011110.30701/ijc.987Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarctionGOUTAM DATTA0Burdwan medical college   Background: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim was to study     actual incidence and outcome of no flow patients. Methods: Five hundred and eighty primary PCI patients were studied over a period of two years i.e. January 2016 to December 2017. Drug eluting stents were used in all cases. Majority of our patients(>90%) came  6 hours  after onset of chest pain. There were many patients where there was  no flow even after mechanical thrombus aspiration and pharmacological vasodilator therapy. We have studied primary outcome(mortality) of no flow in those patients.                                                                                                                 Results: There were 44 cases of  no flow in our series(7.75%). Left anterior descending artery(LAD )was involved in eighteen patients. Right coronary artery(RCA) was culprit in twenty four cases. Only two cases were seen in LCX territory. One month mortality rate in no flow group was 50% and 6.25% in successful recanalization group. One year mortality was 12.5% in successful recanalization group and 66% in no flow group. Conclusion: Refractory no flow during primary PCI in STEMI is associated with high mortality and morbidity. There is no established strategy to solve this phenomenon.     http://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/987Primary PCI, No flow, Mortality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author GOUTAM DATTA
spellingShingle GOUTAM DATTA
Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
Primary PCI, No flow, Mortality
author_facet GOUTAM DATTA
author_sort GOUTAM DATTA
title Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
title_short Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
title_full Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
title_sort incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
publisher Indonesian Heart Association
series Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia
issn 0126-3773
2620-4762
publishDate 2021-03-01
description   Background: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim was to study     actual incidence and outcome of no flow patients. Methods: Five hundred and eighty primary PCI patients were studied over a period of two years i.e. January 2016 to December 2017. Drug eluting stents were used in all cases. Majority of our patients(>90%) came  6 hours  after onset of chest pain. There were many patients where there was  no flow even after mechanical thrombus aspiration and pharmacological vasodilator therapy. We have studied primary outcome(mortality) of no flow in those patients.                                                                                                                 Results: There were 44 cases of  no flow in our series(7.75%). Left anterior descending artery(LAD )was involved in eighteen patients. Right coronary artery(RCA) was culprit in twenty four cases. Only two cases were seen in LCX territory. One month mortality rate in no flow group was 50% and 6.25% in successful recanalization group. One year mortality was 12.5% in successful recanalization group and 66% in no flow group. Conclusion: Refractory no flow during primary PCI in STEMI is associated with high mortality and morbidity. There is no established strategy to solve this phenomenon.    
topic Primary PCI, No flow, Mortality
url http://ijconline.id/index.php/ijc/article/view/987
work_keys_str_mv AT goutamdatta incidenceandoutcomeofnoflowafterprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacutemyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1724230671801516032