Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning

Some science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan R. Luce, Maureen A. Callanan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/full
id doaj-6d28eda2bfee48b7af1bd9f0c683b557
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d28eda2bfee48b7af1bd9f0c683b5572020-11-25T03:46:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-08-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718538775Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s LearningMegan R. LuceMaureen A. CallananSome science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We investigated talk about heat in naturalistic conversation to explore the claim that children often hear heat discussed as a substance rather than as a process, potentially hindering later learning of heat as energy involved in emergent processes. We explored naturalistic speech among children and adults to understand the nature and the frequency of heat- and temperature-related conversations that young children are involved in. This study aims to investigate the actual linguistic resources that children have available as part of a sociocultural approach to cognitive development. Parents’ everyday conversations about heat and temperature with their 2–6-year-old children were drawn from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES) language database and from a parent–child book-reading study. Parents used the word heat rarely, but they did so in ways that implied it is a substance. Parents never talked about heat as an emergent process but sometimes as a direct causal process. Most of the heat- and temperature-related talk, however, focused on words like hot and cold to describe temperature as a property of objects. This investigation of what young children actually experience in everyday conversations is a step toward studying how everyday language may play a role in children’s understanding of heat and temperature.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/fullscience talkparent–child communicationconceptual changescientific thinkingsociocultural perspectives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
spellingShingle Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
Frontiers in Psychology
science talk
parent–child communication
conceptual change
scientific thinking
sociocultural perspectives
author_facet Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
author_sort Megan R. Luce
title Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_short Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_full Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_fullStr Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_full_unstemmed Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_sort family conversations about heat and temperature: implications for children’s learning
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Some science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We investigated talk about heat in naturalistic conversation to explore the claim that children often hear heat discussed as a substance rather than as a process, potentially hindering later learning of heat as energy involved in emergent processes. We explored naturalistic speech among children and adults to understand the nature and the frequency of heat- and temperature-related conversations that young children are involved in. This study aims to investigate the actual linguistic resources that children have available as part of a sociocultural approach to cognitive development. Parents’ everyday conversations about heat and temperature with their 2–6-year-old children were drawn from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES) language database and from a parent–child book-reading study. Parents used the word heat rarely, but they did so in ways that implied it is a substance. Parents never talked about heat as an emergent process but sometimes as a direct causal process. Most of the heat- and temperature-related talk, however, focused on words like hot and cold to describe temperature as a property of objects. This investigation of what young children actually experience in everyday conversations is a step toward studying how everyday language may play a role in children’s understanding of heat and temperature.
topic science talk
parent–child communication
conceptual change
scientific thinking
sociocultural perspectives
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/full
work_keys_str_mv AT meganrluce familyconversationsaboutheatandtemperatureimplicationsforchildrenslearning
AT maureenacallanan familyconversationsaboutheatandtemperatureimplicationsforchildrenslearning
_version_ 1724505069379911680