Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)

True orthophoto is a better product than a classical orthophoto in urban areas, because buildings are depicted in the correct plane position, and the content around the building is also visible. The main goal of our research was to verify two approaches of a true orthophoto production: a) true ortho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mojca Kosmatin Fras, Katja Šušteršič, Aleksandar Šašić Kežul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) 2021-03-01
Series:Geodetski Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://geodetski-vestnik.com/65/1/gv65-1_kosmatin.pdf
id doaj-6d2bdc5be2044579aef2019b4b3c18b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d2bdc5be2044579aef2019b4b3c18b12021-04-09T06:58:58Zeng Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) Geodetski Vestnik0351-02711581-13282021-03-016501274510.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.01.27-45Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)Mojca Kosmatin Fras0Katja Šušteršič1Aleksandar Šašić Kežul2University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Jamova cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaFlycom Technologies d.o.o., Ljubljanska cesta 24a, SI-4000 Kranj, SlovenijaFlycom Technologies d.o.o., Ljubljanska cesta 24a, SI-4000 Kranj, SlovenijaTrue orthophoto is a better product than a classical orthophoto in urban areas, because buildings are depicted in the correct plane position, and the content around the building is also visible. The main goal of our research was to verify two approaches of a true orthophoto production: a) true orthophoto production based on digital terrain model and digital building model, and b) automatic true orthophoto production. We performed the research in two test areas within the Municipality of Ljubljana. We compared the both procedures and the produced true orthophotos with the classical orthophoto, and assessed the production time component as well. To produce true orthophoto, larger overlapping of aerial images is required, thus the time for aerial surveying is increased by approximately 25 percentage. The time of manual work, compared to classical orthophoto production, is lower by the factor 0.27 for automatically produced true orthophoto, and is greater by the factor 2.75 for the true orthophoto based on digital terrain model and digital building model. Aesthetic appearance of automatically produced orthophoto has only minor shortcomings on the buildings’ roof edges which are slightly serrated. Considering all the mentioned aspects, the automatically produced true orthophoto is competitive with the classical orthophoto.http://geodetski-vestnik.com/65/1/gv65-1_kosmatin.pdftrue orthophotoclassical orthophotoautomatic true orthophoto productionbuilding vectorisationlidar point cloudaerial surveying
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mojca Kosmatin Fras
Katja Šušteršič
Aleksandar Šašić Kežul
spellingShingle Mojca Kosmatin Fras
Katja Šušteršič
Aleksandar Šašić Kežul
Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
Geodetski Vestnik
true orthophoto
classical orthophoto
automatic true orthophoto production
building vectorisation
lidar point cloud
aerial surveying
author_facet Mojca Kosmatin Fras
Katja Šušteršič
Aleksandar Šašić Kežul
author_sort Mojca Kosmatin Fras
title Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
title_short Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
title_full Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
title_fullStr Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
title_full_unstemmed Popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = True orthophoto in urban areas)
title_sort popolni ortofoto v urbanih okoljih ( = true orthophoto in urban areas)
publisher Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije)
series Geodetski Vestnik
issn 0351-0271
1581-1328
publishDate 2021-03-01
description True orthophoto is a better product than a classical orthophoto in urban areas, because buildings are depicted in the correct plane position, and the content around the building is also visible. The main goal of our research was to verify two approaches of a true orthophoto production: a) true orthophoto production based on digital terrain model and digital building model, and b) automatic true orthophoto production. We performed the research in two test areas within the Municipality of Ljubljana. We compared the both procedures and the produced true orthophotos with the classical orthophoto, and assessed the production time component as well. To produce true orthophoto, larger overlapping of aerial images is required, thus the time for aerial surveying is increased by approximately 25 percentage. The time of manual work, compared to classical orthophoto production, is lower by the factor 0.27 for automatically produced true orthophoto, and is greater by the factor 2.75 for the true orthophoto based on digital terrain model and digital building model. Aesthetic appearance of automatically produced orthophoto has only minor shortcomings on the buildings’ roof edges which are slightly serrated. Considering all the mentioned aspects, the automatically produced true orthophoto is competitive with the classical orthophoto.
topic true orthophoto
classical orthophoto
automatic true orthophoto production
building vectorisation
lidar point cloud
aerial surveying
url http://geodetski-vestnik.com/65/1/gv65-1_kosmatin.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mojcakosmatinfras popolniortofotovurbanihokoljihtrueorthophotoinurbanareas
AT katjasustersic popolniortofotovurbanihokoljihtrueorthophotoinurbanareas
AT aleksandarsasickezul popolniortofotovurbanihokoljihtrueorthophotoinurbanareas
_version_ 1721532888683380736