Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning

To quantitatively assess target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose rate based on three proposed proton PBS dose rate metrics and study FLASH intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using transmission beams. An in-house FLASH planning platform was developed to optimize transmission (s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minglei Kang, Shouyi Wei, J. Isabelle Choi, Charles B. Simone, Haibo Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/14/3549
id doaj-6d5b78bea6a8437dab02ed225a6a6682
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d5b78bea6a8437dab02ed225a6a66822021-07-23T13:33:43ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-07-01133549354910.3390/cancers13143549Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment PlanningMinglei Kang0Shouyi Wei1J. Isabelle Choi2Charles B. Simone3Haibo Lin4New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USANew York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USANew York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USANew York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USANew York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USATo quantitatively assess target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose rate based on three proposed proton PBS dose rate metrics and study FLASH intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using transmission beams. An in-house FLASH planning platform was developed to optimize transmission (shoot-through) plans for nine consecutive lung cancer patients previously planned with proton SBRT. Dose and dose rate calculation codes were developed to quantify three types of dose rate calculation methods (dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), average dose rate (ADR), and dose-threshold dose rate (DTDR)) based on both phantom and patient treatment plans. Two different minimum MU/spot settings were used to optimize two different dose regimes, 34-Gy in one fraction and 45-Gy in three fractions. The OAR sparing and target coverage can be optimized with good uniformity (hotspot < 110% of prescription dose). ADR, accounting for the spot dwelling and scanning time, gives the lowest dose rate; DTDR, not considering this time but a dose-threshold, gives an intermediate dose rate, whereas DADR gives the highest dose rate without considering any time or dose-threshold. All three dose rates attenuate along the beam direction, and the highest dose rate regions often occur on the field edge for ADR and DTDR, whereas DADR has a better dose rate uniformity. The differences in dose rate metrics have led a large variation for OARs dose rate assessment, posing challenges to FLASH clinical implementation. This is the first attempt to study the impact of the dose rate models, and more investigations and evidence for the details of proton PBS FLASH parameters are needed to explore the correlation between FLASH efficacy and the dose rate metrics.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/14/3549proton therapypencil beam scanningdose rateFLASH radiotherapylung hypofractionation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minglei Kang
Shouyi Wei
J. Isabelle Choi
Charles B. Simone
Haibo Lin
spellingShingle Minglei Kang
Shouyi Wei
J. Isabelle Choi
Charles B. Simone
Haibo Lin
Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
Cancers
proton therapy
pencil beam scanning
dose rate
FLASH radiotherapy
lung hypofractionation
author_facet Minglei Kang
Shouyi Wei
J. Isabelle Choi
Charles B. Simone
Haibo Lin
author_sort Minglei Kang
title Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
title_short Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
title_full Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
title_fullStr Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning
title_sort quantitative assessment of 3d dose rate for proton pencil beam scanning flash radiotherapy and its application for lung hypofractionation treatment planning
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2021-07-01
description To quantitatively assess target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose rate based on three proposed proton PBS dose rate metrics and study FLASH intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using transmission beams. An in-house FLASH planning platform was developed to optimize transmission (shoot-through) plans for nine consecutive lung cancer patients previously planned with proton SBRT. Dose and dose rate calculation codes were developed to quantify three types of dose rate calculation methods (dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), average dose rate (ADR), and dose-threshold dose rate (DTDR)) based on both phantom and patient treatment plans. Two different minimum MU/spot settings were used to optimize two different dose regimes, 34-Gy in one fraction and 45-Gy in three fractions. The OAR sparing and target coverage can be optimized with good uniformity (hotspot < 110% of prescription dose). ADR, accounting for the spot dwelling and scanning time, gives the lowest dose rate; DTDR, not considering this time but a dose-threshold, gives an intermediate dose rate, whereas DADR gives the highest dose rate without considering any time or dose-threshold. All three dose rates attenuate along the beam direction, and the highest dose rate regions often occur on the field edge for ADR and DTDR, whereas DADR has a better dose rate uniformity. The differences in dose rate metrics have led a large variation for OARs dose rate assessment, posing challenges to FLASH clinical implementation. This is the first attempt to study the impact of the dose rate models, and more investigations and evidence for the details of proton PBS FLASH parameters are needed to explore the correlation between FLASH efficacy and the dose rate metrics.
topic proton therapy
pencil beam scanning
dose rate
FLASH radiotherapy
lung hypofractionation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/14/3549
work_keys_str_mv AT mingleikang quantitativeassessmentof3ddoserateforprotonpencilbeamscanningflashradiotherapyanditsapplicationforlunghypofractionationtreatmentplanning
AT shouyiwei quantitativeassessmentof3ddoserateforprotonpencilbeamscanningflashradiotherapyanditsapplicationforlunghypofractionationtreatmentplanning
AT jisabellechoi quantitativeassessmentof3ddoserateforprotonpencilbeamscanningflashradiotherapyanditsapplicationforlunghypofractionationtreatmentplanning
AT charlesbsimone quantitativeassessmentof3ddoserateforprotonpencilbeamscanningflashradiotherapyanditsapplicationforlunghypofractionationtreatmentplanning
AT haibolin quantitativeassessmentof3ddoserateforprotonpencilbeamscanningflashradiotherapyanditsapplicationforlunghypofractionationtreatmentplanning
_version_ 1721289113314787328