Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?

Context: Seroma formation is a common complication after lipoabdominoplasty. Conventionally, drains have been placed to prevent seroma; however, there are problems with drains, namely, pain, compromised mobilisation, breakage, tissue irritation and infection. Strategies to prevent seroma, such as th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Medha Anand Bhave Khair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_23_18
id doaj-6d618672b14e4b2e874cbe3bd68671eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d618672b14e4b2e874cbe3bd68671eb2020-11-25T03:44:46ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery0970-03581998-376X2018-01-01510101502310.4103/ijps.IJPS_23_18Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?Medha Anand Bhave Khair0Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Param Hospital and ICU, Thane, Maharashtra, IndiaContext: Seroma formation is a common complication after lipoabdominoplasty. Conventionally, drains have been placed to prevent seroma; however, there are problems with drains, namely, pain, compromised mobilisation, breakage, tissue irritation and infection. Strategies to prevent seroma, such as the use of glue or quilting sutures have all been attempted with variable and unpredictable benefit. Aims: The author extrapolated the experience with own liposuction protocols to lipoabdominoplasty and began doing away with drains from the year 2006 onwards unless absolutely indicated. Incidence of complications is evaluated here. Settings and Design: This retrospective study is the report of our experience with 204 lipoabdominoplasties performed since 2006 upto December 2016. Subjects and Methods: Consecutive abdominoplasty patients were evaluated for seroma formation, wound dehiscence till suture removal. Nuances of operative details that helped avoid drains were contemplated. Results: Only one patient who had drainless abdominoplasty had seroma formation and wound dehiscence. Conclusions: We found that (a) ‘toilet liposuction’, (a term the author would like to introduce) (b) multilayer wound closure without tension, (c) avoidance of gliding surfaces d) continuous use of pressure garment for 4 days post-operative and (e) reducing the amount of infiltration are the key factors in avoidance of collections and thus seroma formation. If such a technique is diligently followed, desired results are obtained; yet there is no need to insert drains in most patients. Reducing the need of drains permits early ambulation and better patient comfort without seroma and other complications.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_23_18drainless abdominoplastyseromatoilet liposuctionno drains abdominoplasty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Medha Anand Bhave Khair
spellingShingle Medha Anand Bhave Khair
Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
drainless abdominoplasty
seroma
toilet liposuction
no drains abdominoplasty
author_facet Medha Anand Bhave Khair
author_sort Medha Anand Bhave Khair
title Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
title_short Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
title_full Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
title_fullStr Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
title_full_unstemmed Can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
title_sort can drains be avoided in lipo-abdominoplasty?
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
series Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
issn 0970-0358
1998-376X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Context: Seroma formation is a common complication after lipoabdominoplasty. Conventionally, drains have been placed to prevent seroma; however, there are problems with drains, namely, pain, compromised mobilisation, breakage, tissue irritation and infection. Strategies to prevent seroma, such as the use of glue or quilting sutures have all been attempted with variable and unpredictable benefit. Aims: The author extrapolated the experience with own liposuction protocols to lipoabdominoplasty and began doing away with drains from the year 2006 onwards unless absolutely indicated. Incidence of complications is evaluated here. Settings and Design: This retrospective study is the report of our experience with 204 lipoabdominoplasties performed since 2006 upto December 2016. Subjects and Methods: Consecutive abdominoplasty patients were evaluated for seroma formation, wound dehiscence till suture removal. Nuances of operative details that helped avoid drains were contemplated. Results: Only one patient who had drainless abdominoplasty had seroma formation and wound dehiscence. Conclusions: We found that (a) ‘toilet liposuction’, (a term the author would like to introduce) (b) multilayer wound closure without tension, (c) avoidance of gliding surfaces d) continuous use of pressure garment for 4 days post-operative and (e) reducing the amount of infiltration are the key factors in avoidance of collections and thus seroma formation. If such a technique is diligently followed, desired results are obtained; yet there is no need to insert drains in most patients. Reducing the need of drains permits early ambulation and better patient comfort without seroma and other complications.
topic drainless abdominoplasty
seroma
toilet liposuction
no drains abdominoplasty
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_23_18
work_keys_str_mv AT medhaanandbhavekhair candrainsbeavoidedinlipoabdominoplasty
_version_ 1724512830202314752