Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA

Background Hypnosis monitors analyze small-amplitude electrical signals transmitted from the brain that could be exposed to the electromagnetic field that occurs around the body during electrocautery (ECT). We investigated the influence of ECT on hypnosis monitoring during anesthesia. Methods We sim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dae-hee Kim, Ji-young Yoo, Jong-Yeop Kim, Soo-hwan Ahn, Seongsu Kim, Sang-kee Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018-10-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kja-d-18-27154.pdf
id doaj-6da4862b5f424b388419894ee6429d75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6da4862b5f424b388419894ee6429d752020-11-25T03:44:56ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632018-10-0171536837310.4097/kja.d.18.271548408Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTADae-hee Kim0Ji-young Yoo1Jong-Yeop Kim2Soo-hwan Ahn3Seongsu Kim4Sang-kee Min5 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, KoreaBackground Hypnosis monitors analyze small-amplitude electrical signals transmitted from the brain that could be exposed to the electromagnetic field that occurs around the body during electrocautery (ECT). We investigated the influence of ECT on hypnosis monitoring during anesthesia. Methods We simultaneously monitored BIS and uCON during 50 gynecologic oncology surgeries. During the episodes of ECT, we compared the absolute difference (a-Diff) between the baseline index and the most deviated index after ECT over either 30–60 s (ECT30–60) or more than 60 s (ECT > 60) between the monitors. We also investigated the bias and the limits of agreement between the monitors. Results Between the two monitors, the a-Diff of ECT30–60 was 1.4 ± 1.1 for the BIS, which was significantly greater than 0.6 ± 0.9 for the uCON (P = 0.003), and the a-Diff of ECT > 60 was 16.5 ± 8.2 for the BIS, which was also significantly greater than 1.4 ± 1.3 for uCON (P < 0.001). The intra-monitor index differences showed that the BIS during ECT > 60 was significantly greater than that during ECT30–60 (P < 0.001), but the uCON showed no significant difference between ECT30–60 and ECT > 60 (P = 0.056). The estimated bias between the monitors was 6.3 ± 9.8 and 95% limits agreement was –12.3 to 25.0. Conclusions Prolonged ECT intervention might lead to spurious estimations of quantitative EEG indexes. Therefore, hypnosis should be clinically assessed in combination with scrutinized judgment of relevant clinical symptoms and signs for hypnosis.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kja-d-18-27154.pdfanesthesiaelectrocoagulationelectroencephalographyhypnosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dae-hee Kim
Ji-young Yoo
Jong-Yeop Kim
Soo-hwan Ahn
Seongsu Kim
Sang-kee Min
spellingShingle Dae-hee Kim
Ji-young Yoo
Jong-Yeop Kim
Soo-hwan Ahn
Seongsu Kim
Sang-kee Min
Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
anesthesia
electrocoagulation
electroencephalography
hypnosis
author_facet Dae-hee Kim
Ji-young Yoo
Jong-Yeop Kim
Soo-hwan Ahn
Seongsu Kim
Sang-kee Min
author_sort Dae-hee Kim
title Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
title_short Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
title_full Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
title_fullStr Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
title_full_unstemmed Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS and the BIS VISTA
title_sort influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the adms and the bis vista
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background Hypnosis monitors analyze small-amplitude electrical signals transmitted from the brain that could be exposed to the electromagnetic field that occurs around the body during electrocautery (ECT). We investigated the influence of ECT on hypnosis monitoring during anesthesia. Methods We simultaneously monitored BIS and uCON during 50 gynecologic oncology surgeries. During the episodes of ECT, we compared the absolute difference (a-Diff) between the baseline index and the most deviated index after ECT over either 30–60 s (ECT30–60) or more than 60 s (ECT > 60) between the monitors. We also investigated the bias and the limits of agreement between the monitors. Results Between the two monitors, the a-Diff of ECT30–60 was 1.4 ± 1.1 for the BIS, which was significantly greater than 0.6 ± 0.9 for the uCON (P = 0.003), and the a-Diff of ECT > 60 was 16.5 ± 8.2 for the BIS, which was also significantly greater than 1.4 ± 1.3 for uCON (P < 0.001). The intra-monitor index differences showed that the BIS during ECT > 60 was significantly greater than that during ECT30–60 (P < 0.001), but the uCON showed no significant difference between ECT30–60 and ECT > 60 (P = 0.056). The estimated bias between the monitors was 6.3 ± 9.8 and 95% limits agreement was –12.3 to 25.0. Conclusions Prolonged ECT intervention might lead to spurious estimations of quantitative EEG indexes. Therefore, hypnosis should be clinically assessed in combination with scrutinized judgment of relevant clinical symptoms and signs for hypnosis.
topic anesthesia
electrocoagulation
electroencephalography
hypnosis
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kja-d-18-27154.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT daeheekim influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
AT jiyoungyoo influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
AT jongyeopkim influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
AT soohwanahn influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
AT seongsukim influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
AT sangkeemin influenceofelectrocauteryinducedelectromagneticinterferenceonquantitativeelectroencephalographicmonitoringofhypnosisduringgeneralanesthesiacomparisonbetweentheadmsandthebisvista
_version_ 1724512581883789312