Intravaginal Dinoprostone versus Intra Cervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor
No Abstract
Main Authors: | Nasrin Jalilian, Taravat Fakheri, Mohammad Rasoul Ghadami |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Acta Medica Iranica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3849 |
Similar Items
-
Intravaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intra Cervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor
by: Taravat Fakheri, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
by: Aqueela Ayaz
Published: (2010-06-01) -
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
by: Howard Hao Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
by: Khaled İbrahim Abu El AİSH, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
by: Khaled Ibrahim Abu El aish, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)