Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.

We test the ability of Very High Resolution satellite (VHR) imagery to detect stranded whales using both manual and automated methods. We use the 2015 mass mortality event in the Gulf of Penas locality, central Patagonia, Chile, as an initial case study. This event was the largest known mass mortali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter T Fretwell, Jennifer A Jackson, Mauricio J Ulloa Encina, Vreni Häussermann, Maria J Perez Alvarez, Carlos Olavarría, Carolina S Gutstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222498
id doaj-6dd5a105334147d7ac73b5d4d3b0387c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6dd5a105334147d7ac73b5d4d3b0387c2021-03-03T21:10:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022249810.1371/journal.pone.0222498Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.Peter T FretwellJennifer A JacksonMauricio J Ulloa EncinaVreni HäussermannMaria J Perez AlvarezCarlos OlavarríaCarolina S GutsteinWe test the ability of Very High Resolution satellite (VHR) imagery to detect stranded whales using both manual and automated methods. We use the 2015 mass mortality event in the Gulf of Penas locality, central Patagonia, Chile, as an initial case study. This event was the largest known mass mortality of baleen whales, with at least 343 whales, mainly sei whales (Balaenoptera borealis), documented as stranding. However, even with such a large number of whales, due to the remote location of the gulf the strandings went unrecorded for several weeks. Aerial and boat surveys of the area were conducted two to four months after the mortality event. In this study we use 50cm resolution WorldView2 imagery to identify and count strandings from two archival images acquired just after the stranding event and two months before the aerial and ground surveys, and to test manual and automated methods of detecting stranded whales. Our findings show that whales are easily detected manually in the images but due to the heterogeneous colouration of decomposing whales, spectral indices are unsuitable for automatic detection. Our satellite counts suggest that, at the time the satellite images were taken, more whales were stranded than recorded in the aerial survey, possibly due to the non-comprehensive coverage of the aerial survey or movement of the carcases between survey acquisition. With even higher resolution imagery now available, satellite imagery may be a cost effective alternative to aerial surveys for future assessment of the extent of mass whale stranding events, especially in remote and inaccessible areas.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222498
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter T Fretwell
Jennifer A Jackson
Mauricio J Ulloa Encina
Vreni Häussermann
Maria J Perez Alvarez
Carlos Olavarría
Carolina S Gutstein
spellingShingle Peter T Fretwell
Jennifer A Jackson
Mauricio J Ulloa Encina
Vreni Häussermann
Maria J Perez Alvarez
Carlos Olavarría
Carolina S Gutstein
Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Peter T Fretwell
Jennifer A Jackson
Mauricio J Ulloa Encina
Vreni Häussermann
Maria J Perez Alvarez
Carlos Olavarría
Carolina S Gutstein
author_sort Peter T Fretwell
title Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
title_short Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
title_full Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
title_fullStr Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
title_full_unstemmed Using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: The case of sei whales mass mortality in Chilean Patagonia.
title_sort using remote sensing to detect whale strandings in remote areas: the case of sei whales mass mortality in chilean patagonia.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description We test the ability of Very High Resolution satellite (VHR) imagery to detect stranded whales using both manual and automated methods. We use the 2015 mass mortality event in the Gulf of Penas locality, central Patagonia, Chile, as an initial case study. This event was the largest known mass mortality of baleen whales, with at least 343 whales, mainly sei whales (Balaenoptera borealis), documented as stranding. However, even with such a large number of whales, due to the remote location of the gulf the strandings went unrecorded for several weeks. Aerial and boat surveys of the area were conducted two to four months after the mortality event. In this study we use 50cm resolution WorldView2 imagery to identify and count strandings from two archival images acquired just after the stranding event and two months before the aerial and ground surveys, and to test manual and automated methods of detecting stranded whales. Our findings show that whales are easily detected manually in the images but due to the heterogeneous colouration of decomposing whales, spectral indices are unsuitable for automatic detection. Our satellite counts suggest that, at the time the satellite images were taken, more whales were stranded than recorded in the aerial survey, possibly due to the non-comprehensive coverage of the aerial survey or movement of the carcases between survey acquisition. With even higher resolution imagery now available, satellite imagery may be a cost effective alternative to aerial surveys for future assessment of the extent of mass whale stranding events, especially in remote and inaccessible areas.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222498
work_keys_str_mv AT petertfretwell usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT jenniferajackson usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT mauriciojulloaencina usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT vrenihaussermann usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT mariajperezalvarez usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT carlosolavarria usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
AT carolinasgutstein usingremotesensingtodetectwhalestrandingsinremoteareasthecaseofseiwhalesmassmortalityinchileanpatagonia
_version_ 1714818311022182400